Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances changes to Chapter 6 procurement code after labor concerns; ordinance passes first reading
Summary
Supervisors approved on first reading amendments to the city's administrative code (Chapter 6), which modernize public works contracting and clarify sole-source and design-build authority after weeks of labor outreach and debate.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 8-3 on July 16 to pass on first reading an ordinance amending the Administrative Code's Chapter 6 to update contracting processes used by the city's construction departments.
The ordinance was advanced after supervisors considered amendments negotiated between the Department of Public Works and building trades representatives. Supervisor Scott Wiener moved adoption of the distributed amendments; Supervisor Kim seconded. The amendments were adopted without objection, and the ordinance as amended passed first reading with Supervisors Avalos, Campos and Marr recorded in dissent.
Supporters framed the measure as a modernization of procurement rules that would bring Chapter 6 into line with contemporary delivery methods such as design-build and construction-manager/general-contractor. Nicholas King of the Department of Public Works told the board that the legislation "does not touch commission authority to approve contracts," and that existing commission approvals and reporting requirements would remain in place. King said the intent is to streamline administrative processes and to reflect contracting methods that were not common when Chapter 6 was written.
Labor representatives raised concerns in a letter from Local 21 about notification and potential reductions in oversight. Department staff and supervisors described meetings between DPW and multiple unions, including a multi-hour line-by-line review with a Local 21 representative. DPW staff (Edgar Lopez and Nicholas King) reported they had met with labor and agreed to provide equal notification for contract service orders as for task and job orders.
Supporters said sole-source authority would remain limited and documented; the ordinance would preserve annual reporting and a database of sole-source uses. King said that for departments without a commission, approvals would go through the mayor or the mayor's designee and would require written justification when a department seeks a sole-source procurement.
Opponents urged delay to allow more labor discussions. A motion by Supervisor Campos to continue the item for one week failed, 3-8. After debate, the item proceeded to a roll-call vote and passed on first reading.
The ordinance will return for further action under the board's ordinance process. The first-reading passage does not itself change underlying contracts; it authorizes the code changes that will take effect if and when the board completes the legislative process.
Ending The board approved the amendments after DPW reported negotiations with labor and after supervisors debated notification, sole-source limits and continued oversight. The ordinance was adopted on first reading and will return for final consideration under the board's legislative timetable.
