Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance — Goleta City Council (April 2025 meeting)

3001204 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Summary of formal votes recorded at the meeting: consent calendar approved unanimously; user fees resolution adopted unanimously; council directed staff to study a transportation and circulation advisory body (unanimous).

The following formal actions and roll‑call votes were recorded during the meeting:

1) Consent calendar (items A1–A6 and B7) — motion to approve the consent calendar carried on a roll‑call vote recorded as unanimous (ayes: Council members Reyes Martin, Kiriakou, Smith; Mayor Pro Tem Kazdin; Mayor Perotti). Items included minutes; mayoral appointments to commissions; agreements for monarch habitat management plan; an amendment to a housing element implementation services agreement; an update to the community garden operation policy; and appointment of a new city attorney under the city’s contract with Best Best & Krieger LLP.

2) Public hearing and resolution — FY 2025–26 user fees and charges (Item C1) — motion to adopt a resolution rescinding Resolution 24‑23 and adopting the FY 2025–26 user fee schedule passed unanimously on a roll‑call vote (ayes: Reyes Martin; Kiriakou; Smith; Mayor Pro Tem Kazdin; Mayor Perotti). The resolution implements a staff‑recommended average CPI adjustment of 3.3% and several clarifications and fee description cleanups.

3) Direction to staff — Transportation and circulation standing committee (Item D1) — council voted unanimously to direct staff to study the feasibility, costs and structure of a transportation and circulation advisory body (council committee, citizen commission or hybrid) and to return with options and staff recommendation; staff estimated about 100 hours of initial work.

Formal votes were recorded by roll call in the meeting minutes; no recorded votes failed and no abstentions were recorded on these items.