Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage And Use Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council removes "festoon" from display‑device definition after downtown merchants ask for relief
Summary
Rosenberg city council voted to remove the word "festoon" from the unified development code’s display‑device definition after downtown merchants asked for exceptions to permit feather‑style advertising banners; the council intends to workshop broader code changes.
Councilors voted to amend the unified development code’s definitions by removing the term “festoon” from the definition of “display device,” after two downtown merchants asked the council for relief so they could continue use of feather‑style advertising banners outside their stores.
Two downtown business owners — Joni (Moon River Antiques) and Brenda Smith (owner/operator adjacent business) — told the council the feather banners are an inexpensive way to attract customers from the overpass and nearby traffic. They said the banners are placed on a dead‑end block, removed each night and intended to help small merchants draw foot traffic.
City staff and council discussed why the code treats such attention‑getting devices differently: past enforcement followed concerns that feather banners, inflatables, blinking signs and similar devices had proliferated and could be traffic distractions. The city attorney reminded council that sign rules must avoid regulating message content and that display devices are typically limited by time, place and manner restrictions to address safety and aesthetics.
Council members debated whether to relax the rule for downtown only, hold a workshop to craft narrow relief, or grant a temporary variance. After discussion the council adopted a motion to remove the word “festoon” from the definition of display device (the change affects the definition in chapter 8 referenced by the display‑devices agenda item). The motion passed by council vote. Council also directed staff to hold a workshop to consider sign‑code refinements and to return with language and options.
Council emphasized enforcement discretion during the interim; staff noted that broad non‑enforcement can create legal complications and recommended a formal amendment process. The council set follow‑up work to appear on a future agenda and sign‑code workshop schedule.
The change allows the specific device type to remain permissible under the code until the council adopts further changes; other display‑device limits and permit requirements were not removed by this motion.
