Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Finance committee delays gas rate decision after debate over new cost‑of‑service study and distribution of impacts
Summary
Committee discussion on April 15 focused on a new gas cost‑of‑service study that staff said would reallocate costs and produce a 22% median residential bill impact; committee did not adopt rates and asked staff for follow‑up analysis ahead of May budget meetings.
The Palo Alto City Council Finance Committee on April 15 extensively debated a proposed FY26 gas financial forecast and a newly completed cost‑of‑service analysis (COSA) that staff said reallocates costs among customer classes and, as modeled, would raise the median residential gas bill by about 22% (roughly $15.20 per month).
Carla Daley, assistant director of utilities, introduced the gas item and reminded the committee that cost‑of‑service studies are performed roughly every five years and must align with legal limits such as Proposition 26. Lisa Belier summarized the staff recommendation and the Utilities Advisory Commission’s (UAC) suggestion to use cap‑and‑trade‑derived funds to provide a one‑time $73.20 climate credit to reduce the immediate impact on residential customers to about 13% for FY26; staff estimated that credit would cost about $1.6 million.
Why it matters: staff told the committee the new COSA uses a more granular ‘‘average‑and‑excess’’ allocation method and subdivides the large G2 commercial/multiunit customer class by meter capacity. That refinement shifts charges between classes: some…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

