Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Dyslexia topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bentonville School District outlines dyslexia screening and intervention process
Summary
District staff described a tiered, data-driven screening and intervention system for dyslexia, noting state law changes requiring K–3 screening and that parents are notified when students enter tier 2 or tier 3 interventions.
At the April 15 meeting of the Bentonville School District Board of Education, district staff presented an overview of the district's dyslexia screening and response-to-intervention process, describing a data-driven, tiered system designed to identify reading needs early and provide targeted supports.
Assistant superintendent Lisa St. John told the board the system begins with universal screeners in kindergarten through third grade, with diagnostic "testlets" administered to any student who shows risk. "It is designed to support students with learning and behavioral difficulties. It does provide increasing levels of difficulty, and you see those listed as tiers of instruction. It's very data driven," St. John said.
The presentation emphasized that screening is universal and does not require parental approval. St. John said parents are notified if a student is placed in tier 2 or tier 3 and that elementary teachers often discuss such placements during conferences and ask parents to sign acknowledgement letters. Progress monitoring occurs at least monthly for most students and every two weeks for students in intensive tier 3 intervention.
Patty Hawkinson, the district's dyslexia specialist, answered questions about whether the district is seeing more students identified. "The numbers have ebbed and flowed, and it's because we, over the past several years, have made some great educational decisions," Hawkinson said, noting that a new structured-literacy curriculum at the elementary level reduced the need for intervention among younger students. She added that some students show reading difficulties later, in upper elementary or middle school, when multisyllabic reading and spelling demands increase.
St. John and Hawkinson described the screening sequence: universal K'3 screeners (K'midyear and grades 1'beginning/midyear per recent state changes), level 1 dyslexia screeners for students with significant deficits, and level 2 screeners if spelling or other indicators suggest dyslexia; students who meet criteria are placed in dyslexia-specific intervention. Staff said grades 3'12 can be screened at any time based on teacher or parent concerns.
Board members asked about appeals when parents disagree with district assessments. St. John said the district would conduct its own assessments and involve school leadership and the dyslexia specialist as needed, noting an escalation path from teacher to principal to the district dyslexia specialist.
Hawkinson noted the district posts an annual dyslexia report required by the state and suggested that board members and the public consult that report for year-by-year numbers. She also said she is leaving the district and the role will be filled by a replacement.
No action was required; the item was informational and staff said the district will continue to follow state requirements and to refine progress monitoring and data entry procedures.
