Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Budget Cuts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council asks city manager for department-by-department budget options ahead of May 6 review
Summary
Facing required reductions that include police staffing cuts, the council asked the city manager to present department-level budget impacts and alternate savings options at the May 6 budget update so members can consider cuts that might avoid eliminating 12 police positions.
Redding City Council members asked City Manager Greg and staff to provide department-by-department budget information and potential alternative cost-saving options ahead of the May 6 budget update, with several members expressing concern about planned reductions to the police department.
Council members said they want to see specific options that could replace or reduce the planned cuts — including the possible loss of 12 police positions — and asked staff to present what each general-fund department does, how much of its staffing and budget is supported by the general fund, and what the service consequences would be for specific reductions. The city manager recommended presenting each department’s staffing, general-fund allocation and the ramifications of cuts so council members could make informed policy choices.
Council members discussed two approaches: a general overview of departments and a more specific set of proposals that would identify exact positions or line items to cut. The city manager said he could present the department-level information (the first approach) in advance with the packet and that making specific alternative recommendations would require explicit policy direction from the council because choosing program reductions involves policy tradeoffs.
Council members pressed for alternatives to cutting police officers, noting the budget is not final until June 30 and asking staff to show options that could reduce the need to eliminate sworn positions. The city manager said his recommendation for a balanced budget would be presented on May 6 and that changes after that date would require further council policy direction and additional packet material. He said staff would update a previously used template to present departments, costs and the ramifications of reductions and would attempt to provide that information earlier in the packet so council members could review it in advance.
No formal votes were taken on new reductions during the discussion; the council agreed on the schedule for the May 6 budget update and requested further detail from staff.
