Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declines to add advisory outreach language to Historic District Commission ordinance
Summary
After public comment and legal review, the South Kingstown Town Council voted 4–1 to decline proposed ordinance language that would have formally added broad advisory outreach duties to the Historic District Commission.
The South Kingstown Town Council on April 14 voted to decline an amendment to Town Code ch. 2, §2‑41 that would have explicitly authorized the Historic District Commission (HDC) to provide advisory assistance to property owners townwide.
Maury Gates, chair of the HDC, told the council the proposed language was intended to codify outreach and education work the commission already performs, such as preservation awards and owner assistance. Jamie Rabbit, the planning director, and town legal counsel reviewed the proposal and told the council the change would be non‑regulatory and would not expand the HDC's regulatory jurisdiction over properties outside the existing historic district.
Despite those explanations, several council members and other commenters said they preferred not to amend the ordinance during an ongoing, comprehensive review of land‑use codes. Council voted 4–1 to decline drafting the change now; a majority said the commission can continue advisory work under current practice while the town completes an overarching zoning update.
Why it matters: The vote leaves the HDC's practices unchanged but places further ordinance changes on hold pending a broader, town-wide zoning and code review. Several applicants and builders had raised concerns at prior hearings that regulatory language could unintentionally slow housing projects.
Details - Proposal: Add language letting the HDC "promote historic preservation throughout the town by providing advisory assistance to owners of historic properties" and related outreach authority. - Staff/legal view: Planning staff and legal counsel described the proposal as non‑regulatory and largely meant to notify the public of voluntary services the commission offers. - Outcome: Council voted to decline adding the proposed language (4–1). Council members asked staff to include historic‑preservation objectives in the larger zoning/code update rather than as a stand‑alone amendment.
Ending: The HDC remains available to provide informal advice; the council and staff will continue a comprehensive planning‑and‑ordinance review that may revisit HDC language later.
