Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Use Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Troy zoning board approves use variance to convert 253 Sixth Avenue from single-family to two-family

2993745 · April 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Troy Zoning Board granted a use variance for 253 Sixth Avenue after the applicant and board concluded the property already contains an in‑law apartment and separate utilities; the board also issued a negative declaration under state environmental review rules.

The Troy Zoning Board on Jan. 8 approved a use variance allowing 253 Sixth Avenue to be converted from a single‑family residence to a two‑family dwelling.

The applicant, Anne Berry of HDT Estates, told the board the house already contains an in‑law apartment with separate utilities, kitchens and entrances and that converting the property would be necessary to make a reasonable return on the investment. Berry said the owner purchased and renovated a nearby two‑family property at 239 Sixth Avenue and would renovate 253 Sixth Avenue if the variance were granted.

The board chair asked whether neighbors had opposed the application; Berry said no letters of opposition were submitted and that the required public notice was posted. The board discussed the site’s minimal exterior alterations — limited to adding a front door — and the applicant provided a short environmental assessment form to the board.

Citing the staff report, a planning board member moved that the board find the project an unlisted action under the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process and that sufficient information was available; the motion was seconded and carried. The board then made a negative declaration, finding no significant adverse environmental impact.

After deliberation the board voted to grant the use variance, concluding the property’s existing apartment layout and the applicant’s presentation supported findings that the variance would not substantially alter the neighborhood character and that the owner would face financial hardship without approval. The motion to approve was seconded and carried.

The board closed the item after the vote and thanked the applicant.

Notes: The board recorded no written letters of opposition; the applicant represented that neighbor notice was posted. No additional conditions were listed in the transcript beyond the negative declaration and the grant of the variance.