Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Englewood council enters closed session to discuss potential ground‑lease sale near Civic Center; votes recorded 7–0
Summary
Council voted unanimously to go into executive session to discuss the sale or transfer of a ground lease on city‑owned property surrounding the Civic Center; attendees included council, city staff and outside counsel and developers; council later reconvened and closed the session with no public action reported.
Englewood City Council voted unanimously Monday evening to enter an executive session to discuss the potential sale or transfer of the ground lease on city‑owned property surrounding the Civic Center.
The motion to convene the closed session was made during the meeting and seconded by a councilmember; the roll call vote was 7–0 in favor. The council read a list of expected participants for the executive session that included the mayor, the full council, city manager and deputy city manager, the city attorney, outside real‑estate counsel and representatives of the prospective developer.
Why it matters: state open‑meetings law permits executive sessions for the discussion of real‑estate transactions where public disclosure could harm the city’s bargaining position. The council publicly identified the topic as the sale or transfer of the Civic Center ground lease.
Attendance and procedure: the motion listed these participants by name: Mayor O'Daniel Sierra; Mayor Pro Tem Joe Anderson; Councilmembers Chelsea Noonankamp, Tina Prang, Rita Russell, Stephen Ward and Kim Wright; City Manager Sean Lewis; Deputy City Manager Tim Donnas; City Attorney Tamara Niles; consultant Mark Tompkins (Stray Advisory Services); outside real‑estate counsel Kirsten Crawford; Director of Community Development Brad Power; Chief Redevelopment Officer Dan Perumba; and representatives of New Englewood (listed as Dustin Jones and Justin Letkin). The council later reconvened in public and confirmed the executive session had concluded.
Formal record: when the motion was called, the clerk recorded the vote as 7 ayes. At the reconvening, the council voted to close the executive session; that closing vote was again recorded 7–0.
No public action was taken in the executive session and no decisions were announced when council returned to open session; the mayor opened the floor for any person who believed the council had discussed matters not listed in the motion to state concerns on the record and none were raised.
What happens next: because the discussion took place in executive session and no public actions were announced, any subsequent agreements or formal actions related to the Civic Center ground lease will require public motions, votes and disclosure in future open meetings.
