Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the High School Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates Greenwich High School schedule, freshman English levels and house alignment
Summary
At a retreat the board discussed the merits of the existing rotating (drop 2) schedule versus a 7-block day, freshman English course-level structure (1-12/1-13/1-13a), and whether the house system should be re-aligned by grade.
The board reviewed multiple high-school structural issues at the retreat, focusing on three connected topics: (1) the current rotating "drop 2" schedule, (2) the freshman English course structure (commonly discussed as 1-12, 1-13, and 1-13a), and (3) whether houses should be organized by grade.
Staff presented a brief analysis showing the tradeoffs between the frequently used rotating schedule (drop 2) and a seven-block daily schedule. The district said the rotating model allows flexibility and offers students windows for extra help and varied block lengths; a seven-block day would shorten individual class periods but, over the full cycle, provide more instructional minutes per course (district staff estimated about a 14% increase in annual instructional minutes for each course under a seven-block system). Staff noted operational consequences: a seven-block model can complicate internships and off-site learning opportunities, require different staffing for study halls and duties, and change how students obtain extra help or partial-day schedules for health or therapeutic needs.
Board members also debated freshman English levels. The current course set includes multiple tiers: the board discussed whether to collapse or re-label levels to reduce stigma and to ensure appropriate rigor and access. Board members described 1-13a as a notably rigorous freshman offering and asked whether it should carry different weighting; others cautioned that weighting could unintentionally create incentive effects and crowding in specific sections. Staff proposed collecting additional data from the English department about course content, student outcomes and who advances to AP-level English to inform any policy change.
Finally, the board discussed the high school house system. Some trustees argued the current five-house model helps the large school feel smaller and supports counselors and student services; others asked whether re-aligning houses to follow grade cohorts (9, 10, 11, 12) would better support grade-level transitions. Staff said any change would have operational and staffing consequences and recommended further analysis before any structural shift.
Board members asked staff to run scheduling simulations and to provide comparative data on ninth-grade course outcomes, AP matriculation and counselor caseloads under alternative configurations before any vote.
No formal schedule or course-weighting decisions were made at the retreat; staff were directed to return with more detailed modeling and department-level descriptions of course differences.
