Residents urge delay of ballot-marking device contract renewal, cite barcode and touchscreen concerns

2985014 · April 14, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Several residents urged the Commissioners Court to delay or amend a contract renewal for ballot-marking devices and maintenance, citing concerns about touchscreens, barcodes and state/federal actions that could change equipment needs before the 2026 primaries.

Multiple residents urged Collin County commissioners to delay or amend a maintenance/renewal contract for ballot-marking devices and related services, arguing state or federal changes could reduce equipment needs and that touchscreen/barcode systems present security and verifiability concerns.

One speaker, identified in the transcript as "Mr. Reynolds," raised broad security concerns and referenced a recent presidential discussion and a U.S. intelligence briefing, arguing the county should move toward hand-marked paper ballots. Another commenter, Debbie Linster of Citizens Defending Freedom, asked the court to delay a vote by 30 days or amend the contract to include a refund provision if upcoming legislation reduces equipment needs; she cited pending Texas proposals that could allow combined precincts of up to 10,000 voters and a merged early and election-day voting period.

Aida Snowback told the court she opposed "contract amendment number 10," characterizing it as a 3.5% increase over the prior renewal (an additional roughly $20,000) and saying maintenance fees of $370,215 make up the largest portion of maintenance costs; she said total spending on these machines and maintenance has exceeded about $13,500,000 to date. Another resident urged delay until legislation is resolved and referenced an executive order encouraging hand-marked ballots.

No formal action on the contract was recorded in the transcript during this meeting; the comments were part of the public-comment period.