Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board endorses exploring traffic-control box murals; asks staff to draft pilot rules and budget
Summary
The board endorsed pursuing a pilot program to paint traffic-control cabinets and other municipal boxes, discussed using student and community artists, and agreed to draft guidelines, liability waivers and a modest budget for approval at a future meeting.
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Grand Island Economic Development Advisory Board agreed to move forward with exploring a pilot program to decorate traffic-control cabinets and similar utility boxes as small public murals, drawing on high-school art students and community artists.
Board members reviewed research from other municipalities and said New York State has a standard approval form for decorative treatments on state-owned cabinets (TSMI-16-04, referenced). Jen reported that the state has already given preliminary sign-off on decorative treatment for a set of traffic-control cabinets and that municipal approval would be the next step.
Board discussion focused on scope, eligibility, process and funding. Members proposed a staged pilot (three cabinets the first year, then three more annually) and a competition model with categories such as a student winner, community artist winner and a community-vote (fan favorite) prize. Suggested budget concepts included modest honoraria and reimbursement for supplies; members suggested $100—$600 ranges depending on scope and materials needs.
"The state has already given us a thumbs up," a board member observed, summarizing the earlier point that DOT/state approval exists for decorative wraps and that municipal sign-off and an organized application process would be required next.
Next steps: Justin will share Amherst—s program guidelines used as a model; Jose will check counts of eligible boxes and follow up with municipal staff on permissions; the board asked staff to prepare a short written pilot proposal, including sample rules, indemnity/waiver language, a suggested budget and proposed judging criteria, so members can vote on funding at the next meeting.
No final budget was approved; the board instructed staff to return with a written proposal and an estimated cost for the pilot program.

