Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Street Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public Works details sidewalk criteria and $22.5 million backlog; city ties installs to broader capital projects

2979519 · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public Works explained the city’s sidewalk evaluation criteria, prioritization process and funding limits, noting a $22.5 million backlog (about $5.7M arterial, $16.4M nonarterial) and stressing that sidewalks are most efficiently built with coordinated capital projects and utility work.

Public Works staff briefed the committee on how residential sidewalk projects are identified, prioritized and funded, and said that while ordinance standards require sidewalks in many contexts, funding constraints and the city’s capital program create a multi‑year backlog of projects.

Paul Zachary, speaking for Public Works, described the ordinance framework that requires sidewalks on arterials, parkways, commercial/industrial streets, collectors and on both sides of residential local streets that have curb and gutter. Staff described “critical sidewalk areas” (within a tenth of a mile of schools, parks, libraries, transit stops and other pedestrian generators) and said the director’s designee may require sidewalks in additional locations to achieve a logical pedestrian circulation system.

Public Works outlined a nine‑criterion scoring system used to evaluate candidate projects: safety/tripping hazard, pedestrian generators, street classification, school walking routes, infrastructure concerns, transit stops, sidewalk/trail build‑out, cost/funding opportunities and neighborhood concern. Field staff perform on‑site investigations, score each factor and calculate an estimated cost; scores are used to rank projects for the sidewalk priority list.

The department presented funding numbers and backlog totals: staff reported approximately $22.5 million of identified sidewalk needs citywide, including about $5.7 million on arterials and $16.4 million on nonarterial streets. Public Works said typical arterial sidewalk segments can cost from roughly $600,000 to $1,000,000 per mile depending on site conditions (drainage, retaining walls and other constraints), and that coordinated “right‑of‑way to right‑of‑way” complete‑streets projects that combine pavement, water, sewer and sidewalks are more cost‑effective than piecemeal construction.

Staff also described the fee‑in‑lieu program for infill development: where a single infill lot would otherwise create an isolated sidewalk, builders may pay a fee that staff pools and uses for local sidewalk projects; staff said the fee amount was developed with input from the Home Builders Association and that money stays in the council district where it was collected. Committee members asked about right‑of‑way width, tree impacts and damage remediation; staff said residential right‑of‑way is commonly 50 feet (collector streets are often 60 feet) and acknowledged challenges when retrofitting sidewalks through yards, including tree impacts and license‑agreement issues.

Public Works said capital street programs, grants such as Community Development Block Grant funds and coordinated construction remain the primary method to close sidewalk gaps. Staff encouraged councilors to work with constituents and neighborhood leaders to route requests through 311 or council offices so projects enter the evaluation pipeline.