Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves reappointments and nominations; votes to amend agenda and accept area plan
Summary
The Davis County Senior Services Advisory Board voted to amend the agenda to hear the commissioner early, reappointed three board members, recommended one new nominee to the county commission, and unanimously accepted the department’s area plan with modified priorities and operational waivers.
The Davis County Senior Services Advisory Board conducted several formal votes on April 1 during routine business.
Votes at a glance
- Amend agenda to move the commissioner’s report (item 7) to item 3: Motion carried (voice vote; unanimous). The motion was made and seconded by board members; the chair declared, "Motion carries."
- Reappoint Mark Perry to the advisory board for a three-year term (2023–2026): Motion carried (voice vote; unanimous). The board made a motion and recorded a second; the chair noted, "All in favor, say aye. Aye."
- Reappoint Larry Millward for a three-year term beginning July 2026: Motion carried (voice vote; unanimous).
- Reappoint Lorna Kosai for a three-year term (January 2025–2028): Motion carried (voice vote; unanimous).
- Recommend nomination of Mike Allred to replace Becky Capp (recommendation to the county commission): Motion carried (voice vote; unanimous). Mike Allred spoke briefly about his volunteer work and experience as a SHIP (Medicare) counselor and was recommended to the commission for appointment.
- Concur with director Rochelle’s proposed priority re-ordering (as presented at meeting): Motion carried (voice vote; unanimous).
- Accept the four-year area plan as presented with the approved priority changes and operational waivers: Motion carried (voice vote; unanimous). Following a motion and second, the chair called the vote and declared the motion passed.
The minutes from January were accepted earlier in the meeting by voice vote. The board also adjourned by unanimous consent at the meeting’s close.
The board’s votes were procedural and focused on appointments, the agenda order, and formal acceptance of the area plan; no contested roll-call tallies were recorded in the minutes.
