Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Library board approves policy changes removing fees for lost cards, alters appeals committee membership

2966418 · April 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Davis County Library Board approved updates removing routine fees for lost or damaged library cards and adjusted the makeup of the administrative review and appeals committees to include all branch managers, aligning internal rules with an earlier ordinance change.

The Davis County Library Board on April 10 approved two policy changes: the removal of routine fees for lost or damaged library cards and a change to committee membership that adds all branch managers to the administrative review committee.

Board Chair Sarah Reed opened the action item and library staff explained the rationale. Library Director Josh Johnson said the fee removal matches a prior ordinance change and reflects that “the cost of library cards has dropped to the point where it's just not fair to charge for a lost card.” He told the board the charge would be used only in rare cases — for repeated loss or clear inability to handle a card — and that staff will still protect patron privacy and consider exceptions when appropriate.

The updates also revise the membership of the administrative review and appeals committees, which handle collection and removal requests. Under the change, the administrative review committee will include all branch managers; staff said site managers would continue to be available if the library splits the work into two teams due to backlog. Johnson described the multi-step appeal pathway: staff-level administrative review, an appeals committee made up of managers and three board members, and, if requested, final appeal to the full board — the last available review.

Johnson and other staff emphasized that the library’s collection development and reconsideration process is intended to be transparent and iterative. He said a patron’s initial request is reviewed by trained library professionals and that decisions may be appealed first administratively and then to the appeals committee. If unresolved, the matter can be brought to the full board at a regularly scheduled public meeting.

Board members asked procedural questions during the discussion, including where patrons can view the selection policy online; staff demonstrated that policies and the selection policy are posted on the library’s public website and available as searchable Google Docs. Staff also reminded the board that certain policies — notably internet-safety policies for minors — are subject to a three-year state review and that the library must report that review to the state library by July to retain some state funding lines.

A board member moved to approve the two policy updates; a motion to approve was seconded by Rosalie Taylor. The board voted in favor and the measures were adopted.

The policy changes take effect immediately; staff said they will circulate the updated policies and memos listing the committee assignments to board members and post the revised policies online.