Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New Era’s proposed flagship at 300 Lafayette draws opposition to large interior‑facing digital screens and illuminated soffits
Summary
Representatives for New Era presented a signage and AV program for a flagship at 300 Lafayette that includes multiple interior‑facing digital screens — most prominently a 22‑foot‑wide vestibule display — and a mix of canopy, blade and pin‑mounted signs; committee members and neighbors raised safety and light pollution concerns.
Representatives for New Era presented a signage and interior‑facing AV program for the company’s new flagship at 300 Lafayette Street, including multiple interior‑mounted digital screens visible from the street and several illuminated canopy and halo‑type signs on the building’s three primary façades.
Why it matters: The largest proposed element is an interior‑mounted, video‑capable panel above the entry vestibule that applicants described in drawings as roughly 22 feet wide and set back from the glazing. Committee members, board members and public commenters raised safety and streetscape concerns — particularly about the visual intensity, motion imagery and night‑time brightness of the large vestibule screen and of other illuminated elements — and asked the applicant for more specific operational limits and a documented agreement with the neighborhood.
Architect John Fox (TPG Architecture) and signage vendor representative Philip Light (SineWave) outlined a multi‑part package: non‑illuminated vinyl logos on glass, three canopy signs with indirect illumination, blade signs on terracotta columns and three interior AV screens (one large screen above the vestibule and smaller screens on Crosby and East Houston). Fox said the large vestibule screen would sit behind the glass and would be framed with polished metal; the team said all displays were two feet or more from the glazing per their proposed details and that the interior screens would be provided by Planar.
Public comment and committee reaction focused on the vestibule screen’s size, potential for motion imagery, and the cumulative impact of multiple illuminated elements at a major entry point to SoHo. Pete Davies of the Broadway Residents Coalition noted that the corner is visible along sightlines from Sixth Avenue and said a highly visible moving display “is going to be visible for blocks.” Committee members asked whether New Era would commit to limits on motion graphics, duration of image sequences, brightness levels and evening shutoff times; the applicant said New Era wants a prominent store identity but that they were prepared to discuss brightness controls, static imagery during evening hours and other mitigations.
Next steps: The applicants said they would work with the committee and LPC to provide additional details and that the client was open to negotiation on image duration and brightness. The committee agreed to forward comments to the full board and urged a written agreement with the applicant on operating parameters before LPC consideration.
