Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Bylaws topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board backs three zoning bylaw changes; will recommend articles to town meeting
Summary
At its April 10 meeting the Lakeville Planning Board voted to recommend three zoning bylaw amendments — changes to site plan review applicability and procedure, an updated ADU definition referencing state rules, and deletion of the older accessory apartment bylaw — for consideration at town meeting.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Bylaws topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lakeville Planning Board voted Thursday to recommend three proposed amendments to the town's zoning bylaws for consideration at an upcoming town meeting.
The board opened public hearings and recommended approval for: edits to the site plan review section (Section 270-6.7) that clarify when site plan review applies and add a required statement of proposed use in submissions; an amendment to the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) definition (Section 270-2.1) to incorporate and reference the applicable state ADU rules; and deletion of the older accessory apartment bylaw (Section 270-7.8) now made redundant by state ADU standards.
The proposed site plan review changes revise applicability language so that expansions or intensifications of commercial or industrial uses that change traffic, noise, parking or lighting would trigger review and they list certain activities that would not be subject to review (for example, internal building modifications that do not change the scale or impact of a use). The board also voted to add a submittal requirement of a "statement of proposed use" and make administrative updates to review procedures.
Planning staff told the board the edits were developed after feedback from the former town planner and were designed to strengthen and clarify local procedures. The ADU amendment explicitly references 760 CMR 71 (the state ADU rules) so the town definition will automatically align with changes at the state level. The accessory apartment bylaw was proposed for deletion because the state ADU rules are less restrictive and the older bylaw required the accessory unit to be attached; the board noted this would reduce conflicting provisions in the zoning code.
A motion to open each public hearing was made and seconded, and motions to recommend each article for town meeting were approved by voice vote; the meeting record shows the motions carried without opposition.

