Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Parking Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews draft update to Jurupa Valley residential parking permit policy; staff to refine and return with costs
Summary
Public Works staff presented proposed revisions to the citywide residential permit-parking policy, expanding guidance on petitions, permit types, renewal periods and enforcement. The committee asked for refinements and cost estimates and directed staff to return the draft to committee before forwarding to City Council.
Public Works staff presented an update on April 10 to Jurupa Valley’s residential permit-parking policy, describing proposed changes to how neighborhoods petition for permit parking, what kinds of permits would be issued, and enforcement.
"Good evening, committee members. Steve Laurisso, here to talk about this," said Steve Laurisso as he introduced the proposal and its background. Staff said a 2018 City Council resolution originally established the citywide permit-parking approach and that only two permit zones existed at the time (Pedley and Rubedo areas). The draft update would add clearer petition procedures, specify permit types and quantities, and allow for a fee to be charged for permits.
Key elements staff presented: a petition process requiring neighborhood organization of signatures (both sides of the street must participate), a 75% approval threshold for neighborhoods to move forward, the possibility of two resident permits per household plus up to two visitor permits, issuance of temporary or day passes for short events, and a proposed renewal period (staff initially proposed three years but said any period could be considered). Staff also described enforcement by code enforcement officers and noted summer enforcement coverage in areas with seasonal river access.
Committee members asked about resident notification/field reviews and asked that district council members be included in field reviews in their districts. Committee members asked staff to provide cost estimates for signage, enforcement and permit administration before the policy is finalized. Several members emphasized the policy is a draft and should be refined with community input.
The committee gave staff consensus direction to refine the draft, develop cost estimates (including fees for permits and temporary passes), consider grace-period language for events, and bring a revised draft back to the committee before any recommendation to City Council. No committee vote or council action occurred at the meeting.
