Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Veto Overrides And Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kansas Senate overrides multiple gubernatorial vetoes, approves budget line items and several policy changes
Summary
On April 10, 2025, the Kansas Senate overrode a series of vetoes from Governor Laura Kelly and approved conference committee reports, including measures on election funding, quarantine powers, income-tax triggers, SNAP purchases, and multiple budget and policy items.
Get email alerts on the Veto Overrides And Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Kansas Senate on April 10, 2025 voted to override a series of vetoes from Governor Laura Kelly and approved multiple conference committee reports, adopting a package of bills ranging from election funding restrictions and public-health procedures to income-tax triggers and budget line items.
The overrides and votes came during a lengthy floor session that produced final action on more than a dozen bills and several conference committee reports. Senate leaders said the measures reflect priorities on elections oversight, public-health authority, tax relief triggers and state spending; opponents warned some steps were rushed and bundled without sufficient individual debate.
Votes at a glance
- Senate Bill 5 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion to pass the bill notwithstanding the governor’s veto moved by Senator Thompson. Tally: 31 yes, 9 no. Summary: The bill expands the existing prohibition on accepting or expending outside funds for election administration to explicitly include monies provided by any federal branch, agency, department, office or bureau; the Senate added an exemption for funds used for election security. Senator Thompson argued, "All that Senate Bill 5 does is expand that prohibition by including monies provided by any branch, agency, department, office, or bureau of the federal government." The governor’s veto message warned the measure would "undermine our ability to conduct secure and efficient elections." (Provenance: discussion begins at transcript block starting 4254.575; final tally at block 4816.46.)
- Senate Bill 29 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Gossage. Tally: 31 yes, 9 no. Summary: The bill modifies procedures for isolation and quarantine, including requirements for probable cause and a 72-hour civil-action mechanism for someone who alleges wrongful quarantine; supporters said it preserves public-health authority but adds procedural protections. (Provenance: starts block 4819.1; final tally block 5085.875.)
- Senate Bill 269 (Conference Committee Report) — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Tyson. Tally: 30 yes, 10 no. Summary: Conference committee report implements an income-tax trigger mechanism that would lower state income tax rates when state reserves meet specified thresholds. Senator Tyson described the mechanism as automatic reductions when certain reserve thresholds are met: "Once we reach a certain threshold in the state of Kansas... an equation would kick into place to lower state income taxes for the next year." Opponents said the approach shifts focus away from property-tax relief and could disproportionately benefit higher-income households. (Provenance: discussion begins block 5097.7803; final tally block 6140.715.)
- Senate Bill 14 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Masterson. Tally: 31 yes, 9 no. Summary: A continuing-appropriation measure intended to prevent a government shutdown; described by supporters as an anti-shutdown bill. (Provenance: discussion begins block 6155.69; final tally block 6343.14.)
- Senate Bill 79 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Erickson. Tally: 29 yes, 11 no. Summary: The bill would require the Kansas Department for Children and Families to seek a USDA waiver to exclude sugar-sweetened beverages and candy from SNAP purchases; supporters said it would improve nutrition, while opponents warned it would complicate store operations and access to benefits. (Provenance: discussion begins block 6354.845; final tally block 6987.364.)
- Senate Bill 125 (Budget line items) — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override of multiple line-item vetoes). Motion moved by Senator Masterson. Tally recorded in the transcript as passing (final recorded tally: 30 yes, 10 no). Summary: The Senate voted to override numerous line-item vetoes in the enacted budget (SB 125), restoring many allocations the governor had removed or reduced. Debate on bundling and the speed of consideration featured repeatedly; several senators said they opposed bundling many vetoes into a single up-or-down vote. (Provenance: motion begins block 14770.13; final tally block 15837.915.)
- House Bill 2062 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Warren. Tally: 31 yes, 9 no. Summary: The conference committee report included provisions to allow child-support orders to include pregnancy-related medical expenses from conception and to enable collection from retirement accounts for arrearages; supporters described it as support for children and pregnant women. (Provenance: discussion begins block 16107.561; final tally block 16387.074.)
- Senate substitute for House Bill 2240 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Erickson. Tally: 31 yes, 9 no. Summary: The measure restricts state agencies from seeking or implementing federal waivers that would expand eligibility or increase state cost for public assistance programs without legislative approval; supporters said the legislature should control such policy decisions, the governor argued the bill would impede program functioning. (Provenance: discussion begins block 16515.55; final tally block 16915.506.)
- House Bill 2311 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Gausage. Tally: 31 yes, 9 no. Summary: The bill bars the Department for Children and Families from denying a foster or adoptive application solely because of the applicant’s sincerely held religious or moral beliefs about sexual orientation or gender identity; the governor vetoed citing risks to best-interest standards and potential lawsuits. (Provenance: discussion begins block 17032.74; final tally block 17228.09.)
- Senate substitute for House Bill 2382 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Erickson. Tally: 31 yes, 9 no. Summary: The bill requires a short fetal-development presentation in any course covering human growth or development and addresses State Board compensation; the governor vetoed on grounds of undermining local control and lacking evidence-based standards. (Provenance: discussion begins block 17374.49; final tally block 17612.049.)
- House Bill 2033 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Erickson. Tally: 32 yes, 8 no. Summary: Adds certain programs accredited by an international multisensory structured language education council to the state's approved at-risk educational programs list; governor said the State Board of Education had already added those programs. (Provenance: discussion begins block 17747.75; final tally block 18004.186.)
- House Bill 2284 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Gausage. Tally: 30 yes, 10 no. Summary: Requires Department of Administration to adopt policies for negotiated procurement of managed care organizations (MCOs) for Medicaid; the veto message warned of constitutional and procurement concerns. (Provenance: discussion begins block 18142.11; final tally block 18443.2.)
- House Bill 2291 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Owens. Tally: 30 yes, 10 no. Summary: Creates a regulatory-relief division in the attorney general's office and a general regulatory sandbox program to waive or suspend rules for participants; the governor vetoed citing lawmaking authority concerns. (Provenance: discussion begins block 18550.174; final tally block 18761.92.)
- House Bill 2217 — Passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto (override). Motion moved by Senator Gossage. Tally: 30 yes, 10 no. Summary: Expands the inspector general's audit and investigative authority over state cash, food and health assistance programs; supporters argued it would provide legislative access to findings, opponents warned of duplication with existing units. (Provenance: discussion begins block 18876.361; final tally block 19308.605.)
- Conference committee reports (selected) — The Senate approved several conference committee reports and companion bills by recorded votes (examples: House Bill 2045 on child-care-related changes, conference report adopted with recorded Aye/No votes). House Bill 2045 — conference report adoption: 29 yes, 11 no; the conference measure reorganizes early-childhood functions and licensing under a new Office of Early Childhood and revises provider ratios and education requirements. Several smaller conference reports for judicial and criminal procedure bills (SB 156, SB 186, SB 204, SB 237) were approved as recorded in the transcript. (Provenance: HB2045 discussion begins block 22935.5; final tally block 23479.33; other conference reports appear from block 19559.06 onward.)
What senators said
- Senator Thompson, speaking for Senate Bill 5, summarized the bill’s effect: "All that Senate Bill 5 does is expand that prohibition by including monies provided by any branch, agency, department, office, or bureau of the federal government." He framed it as a separation-of-powers issue. The governor’s veto message described the bill as micromanaging and said restricting federal election funds "undermines our ability to conduct secure and efficient elections."
- On tax policy, Senator Tyson described SB 269’s trigger mechanism as an automatic reduction that would take effect when reserves reach a statutory threshold and said, "an equation would kick into place to lower state income taxes for the next year." Opponents including Senator Corson pressed that promised property-tax relief had not been achieved and warned the measure ties future legislatures’ hands.
- Several senators criticized the process of bundling many line-item veto overrides and budget line items into single motions. Multiple speakers—including members who voted no—said they supported individual line items yet opposed the bundled, up-or-down approach used to override many vetoes at once.
Process and next steps
Bills that passed notwithstanding the governor’s veto become law unless successfully challenged or otherwise delayed by additional legal or procedural steps; some measures (for example, tax-code changes) include delayed effective dates or triggers described in the enacted text. Conference committee reports that were adopted complete the legislative process for the listed bills and direct enrolled copies to the governor for action or finalization.
The Senate adjourned after the votes; several committees and caucuses were scheduled to meet following the session. Reported public record entries include the governor’s veto messages, which were read on the floor and discussed during the override debate.
Ending
The floor session produced a substantial package of enacted measures through overrides and conference report approvals. Senators on both sides said the outcomes would have tangible effects on election funding rules, public-health procedures, tax policy and budget allocations; disagreements about process and priorities marked the debates that accompanied most final votes.

