Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves conditional-use permit to expand Kootenai County landfill; staff cite wetland and tribal coordination conditions
Summary
The board approved CUP 240011 allowing a lateral expansion of the county landfill that would add about 197 acres of fill area, extend capacity roughly 10 years and provide about 9.2 million cubic yards of additional storage; the decision includes conditions addressing wetlands, cultural resources and previously imposed permit conditions.
Kootenai County commissioners on April 10 voted to approve CUP 240011, a conditional-use permit to expand the county landfill in the southwest quadrant of Kootenai County. The expansion would add approximately 197 acres of new fill area within a 490-acre project boundary and is intended to extend landfill capacity by about 10 years.
Vlad Finkel, presenting for county planning staff, said the project traces to earlier approvals in 1989 (CUP-687-89) and a 1999 modification. He described a site composed of 13 contiguous parcels west of Highway 95, just north of Fighting Creek Road, and told the board the proposed south-cell expansion is largely isolated from neighboring residential development by topography.
Finkel said staff found several wetland areas within the proposed expansion footprint and coordinated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; the Corps advised there is a permitting and mitigation process to address wetland impacts and that the county is incorporating those requirements into permit conditions. The record also reflects that county consultants concluded the expansion would allow an additional 9.2 million cubic yards of solid-waste storage and postpone capacity constraints by about a decade. Without the expansion, the facility was estimated to reach capacity in roughly 17 years (around February 2042).
The presentation and record include a brief period of late-arriving tribal concerns over cultural resources. Callahan and Finkel told the board there had been prior coordination with the tribe and consultants, but recent staffing and email-delivery problems on the tribal side delayed receipt of some comments; county staff said they had re-established communication with tribal counsel and would continue to work jointly to address any cultural-resource issues.
Finkel said most state and federal reviewers raised no objections beyond the standard mitigation and permitting steps. The hearing examiner recommended approval on March 6, and the staff report carries forward conditions intended both to address new impacts and to preserve several conditions from the earlier permits (conditions 8.11 and 8.12–8.16 in the staff packet) that the hearing examiner said should remain in effect.
Commissioners concluded the conditions could mitigate concerns and voted to approve the permit with conditions. Commissioner Eberline voted aye, Commissioner Duncan voted aye, and Chair Metari voted aye.
Staff noted the approval specifically restricts some parcels from future use as landfill cells (per condition 8.11) while allowing their use for supporting infrastructure such as roads, buildings and stormwater features. The approval also directs the applicant to complete required wetland permitting and any necessary cultural-resource coordination before implementing the expansion.
