Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cities and counties seek optional planning-commission term alignment and reporting change in SB48
Summary
Senate Bill 48 (as amended) would let counties with populations under 700,000 and their cities adopt ordinances aligning planning-commissioner terms with appointing officials or have commissioners serve at the pleasure of the governing body; the bill also adjusts reporting timelines for the Truckee Meadows region.
City of Reno staff presented an amendment to Senate Bill 48 to align planning-commissioner term and appointment practices across jurisdictions and to adjust a reporting timeline to match municipal fiscal-year cycles.
Nick Ciccone of the City of Reno said the amendment allows any county with population under 700,000 and cities within that county to adopt an ordinance making planning-commissioner terms coincide with the terms of the appointing official; the amendment also permits counties with population of 700,000 or more and their cities to adopt ordinances letting planning commissioners serve at the pleasure of the governing body. The bill also changes the regional reporting timeline for Reno, Sparks and Washoe County to fiscal-year reporting and moves the effective date to allow administrative adjustments.
Supporters including the Nevada League of Cities, the Nevada Urban Consortium, builders and planning associations said the changes modernize local governance and provide optional tools for jurisdictions to coordinate appointment terms and align administrative reporting. No opposition testimony was offered at the hearing.
Outcome: Committee closed the hearing on SB48; sponsors and municipal groups said the measure is optional for jurisdictions and intended to reflect practices already in place in larger counties.
