Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sustainability Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City sustainability office outlines process for spending Prop Port reserve funds; commission to form review subcommittee
Summary
The city's sustainability deputy director described how a sustainability reserve account created under the Prop Port tax-exemption will be reviewed and administered: the office will solicit proposals and the Sustainability Commission plans a five-member subcommittee to consult annually on funding priorities.
The Providence sustainability office presented an update on the sustainability reserve account tied to the Prop Port tax-exemption at the April 9 meeting, describing how the account is administered, current balances and a proposed selection process for spending the funds.
Why it matters: the ordinance creating the account directs 1% of Prop Port revenue into a reserve for sustainability projects; the account is intended to support environmental remediation, air-quality projects, climate adaptation and related infrastructure that align with the port master plan. The committee was briefed on how the Sustainability Office and the volunteer Sustainability Commission plan to consult on project selection and procurement.
Deputy Director Kevin Croft said the ordinance sets a floor of $120,000 per year but noted the account’s first-year deposit exceeded that minimum (about $150,000 in year one). He reported the fund balance is now approximately $250,000–$300,000 (amounts cited in meeting as approximate and cumulative by quarter). The office said it will manage procurement and contracts through the city's normal solicitation processes and that the commission seeks a small subcommittee (about five members) to review the master-plan-derived project categories and help select proposals.
Process presented: staff and the commission plan to clarify the commission’s consultation role, convert a working memo into a formal policy, and have the subcommittee annually recommend one or more projects plus alternates. The Sustainability Office will draft an RFP aligned with commission recommendations, run city procurement, and administer awarded projects, with the commission receiving reports and voting on finalists before selections move forward.
Funding approach and flexibility: Croft and commission members discussed two approaches: (1) annual grants to community groups or small projects, and (2) allowing the account to accumulate for multi-year leverage (for example to provide local matches that unlock larger federal or private funds). The office flagged that reserve funds could also be used as match to leverage federal grants, state funds or private foundation dollars and that the selection process should retain flexibility to pursue either immediate small grants or larger, multi-year projects.
Council involvement and transparency: the presentation noted the master plan is intended to inform project categories and that the Sustainability Commission intends to create a policy or process that survives staff and commission turnover. Croft and commissioners agreed to brief relevant council members and that final project allocations would be transparent and subject to procurement and City Council processes as required by ordinance.
Ending: the Sustainability Office expects the commission subcommittee to meet soon and to return a formal process recommendation; the office will bring a draft policy and RFP language forward once project categories from the master plan are finalized.
