Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission conditionally approves landmark designation for North Broadway/Emerald bungalow court
Summary
The Public Amenities Commission approved designation of a bungalow court at 102–106 North Broadway and 401–405 Emerald Street as a local historic landmark, subject to Minor Alteration Subcommittee review of select exterior elements.
The Public Amenities Commission voted to designate the bungalow court at 102–106 North Broadway and 401–405 Emerald Street as a local historic landmark under the city’s preservation ordinance, subject to review of specific exterior details by the Minor Alteration Subcommittee.
Staff emphasized the site’s architectural character, its listing in the city’s 1986 survey and associations with former Mayor Charles Wortham and Fire Captain Floyd Ingram.
The nut graf: Senior Planner Andrew Spytec told commissioners the site — a nine‑unit bungalow court built on a 10,100‑square‑foot lot — meets multiple local criteria for landmark designation (including its architectural form and historical associations) and that staff recommends adoption of an exemption declaration and approval of the designation if the commission finds the criteria satisfied.
In his presentation Andrew Spytec described the property and the staff recommendation: "Staff now recommends that the public commission, if the public commission finds that the application meets the criteria, that it adopt the exemption declaration and approve the landmark designation for the property located at 102104106 North Broadway and 401403 And 403 Emerald Street." Spytec walked commissioners through the site’s defining features — arched walkways, red barrel tile roofs, smooth light‑colored stucco, decorative parapets and the bungalow‑court layout — and noted the property is listed in the city’s earlier historic resources surveys.
Commission discussion focused on how the designation would be administered and whether the site should be considered as part of a larger district. Spytec said the city’s practice has been to accept owner applications for individual landmark designations because earlier proposals for district formation stalled when owners’ consent was not obtained.
A motion to approve the designation included a condition that the Minor Alteration Subcommittee review and advise on certain elements raised in the staff presentation and by commissioners — specifically exterior doors, lighting fixtures and any window changes that affect character‑defining elements. The commission adopted the motion by voice vote.
Ending: With the designation in place, staff said it will return appropriate paperwork to reflect the conditional requirements and to record the property as a local landmark. The Minor Alteration Subcommittee will review any proposed changes to character‑defining features before final administrative approvals are issued.
Speakers quoted: Andrew Spytec, Senior Planner (staff presentation).
