Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Tax Levy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
East Meadow presents $271.3 million proposed budget; tax levy set at 3.26% pending state aid
Summary
District staff presented a proposed 2025–26 budget that maintains current programs and keeps class sizes steady while projecting a $271,288,003 spending plan and a 3.26% tax levy; officials said the state budget and final aid numbers could change the levy before adoption.
The East Meadow Union Free School District presented a proposed 2025–26 spending plan of $271,288,003 and said the district’s tax levy calculation currently stands at 3.26%.
During the board meeting, a district presenter described the budget’s priorities as maintaining academic, music, art and athletic programs, improving security infrastructure and preparing students for the “21st century.” The presenter said cost drivers include salaries and benefits, mandatory indirect costs, retirements, special-education services and transportation.
“Proposed Budget maintains all current instructional and co‑curricular programs and services, maintains class sizes,” the presenter said.
Why it matters: the tax levy number determines how much property owners pay after state aid is applied. The district told the board the state budget had not been finalized and that the aid estimate included in the proposal could change once Albany completes action. Board members and staff said that uncertainty affects the final levy calculation before the board adopts a budget.
Key details provided by staff: the district must present its budget in three parts—administration, program and capital—and staff showed a breakdown of capital projects totaling about $2 million for districtwide work to be performed both by the maintenance team and external contractors. Staff also said updated retirement system numbers (ERS and TRS) tightened earlier estimates and reduced the projected impact by about $2 million compared with an earlier draft.
The presenter explained a contingency (no‑increase) budget scenario: if the budget were to fail, the district would revert to a contingency plan that would eliminate capital projects and force the district to maintain the current tax levy level for 2025–26, which could require reductions in staff and larger class sizes.
Board members asked for clarifications about possible staffing impacts in a contingency scenario. A district staff member said that a contingency budget “is a possibility” if the budget fails and that staffing reductions could follow if the district is frozen at current funding levels.
Next steps and timing: district staff said the state budget figures were due from the governor’s office and that the estimate used in the presentation is subject to change. Staff also said the budget presentation would be posted online and that community forums and additional presentations would continue before the board adopts the budget.
Ending: board members did not vote on the budget at this meeting; the board scheduled further public information and an eventual adoption vote after state aid numbers are finalized.
