Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic building at 3438 Soledad red‑tagged; board weighs partial demolition and facade salvage
Summary
The Historic Resources Board was told a finalized historic structures report and a recent break‑in have left the long‑vacant building at 3438 Soledad red‑tagged and at risk of demolition, with staff preparing emergency repair quotes and board members pressing to salvage the building’s east façade.
Grant Leonard, the city planning manager, told the Historic Resources Board that TEF/TF Design’s historic structures report for 3438 Soledad concluded the building “qualified as potentially historic” under state and federal criteria but also identified serious structural and cosmetic deficiencies after four decades of vacancy. He said the finalized report is in the board packet and that a subsequent break‑in and recent storms have accelerated damage to the south and east walls.
“The building has been red tagged, so officially condemned for no entry,” Leonard said. He told the board staff are preparing quotes and requests for proposals for emergency repairs and that, depending on the rate of deterioration, demolition may need to be considered. He added that the city has boarded the building and patched the most obvious breach.
Board members asked whether a partial demolition focused on unsafe walls would be possible rather than full demolition. Leonard said he would consult the chief building official about whether removing only the damaged portions would meet public‑safety requirements. Board members and several commenters emphasized preserving the east‑facing facade if demolition is necessary.
Members discussed the building’s mixed construction: poured reinforced concrete on the west and north walls versus wood construction on the south and east façades, where rot, dry rot and prior fire damage were concentrated. A board member noted the east façade is the public face of the property and said, “For me, it’s all about the east facing facade,” urging salvage of character‑defining elements if removal is required.
Leonard said the historic‑structures report identified façade artifacts that the city should remove for preservation before any demolition. TF Design’s work, he said, will inform whether the surviving façade could be incorporated into future mixed‑use construction, or be reconstructed “like for like” if the original fabric must be removed.
Board members also raised design alternatives, including integrating the original façade into new construction, using murals or partial reconstructions to preserve the street appearance, and salvaging interior documentation and photographic records if physical elements cannot be retained.
Leonard said the planning department will notify the board as the situation develops and that the chief building official would be the ultimate decision maker if immediate public‑health or safety demolition becomes necessary. He said staff will provide updates and that requests for proposals for stabilization work are being prepared.
Background: TF Design prepared design options as part of the city’s predevelopment work for the site. The building has been vacant long term; the finalized historic structures report recommended cataloging and salvaging notable facade elements given the building’s potential historic significance.
Next steps identified during the meeting included staff consulting the chief building official about partial demolition, preparing emergency stabilization quotes, and preserving documented historic elements from the east façade if removal is required.
