Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nuisance Property Designation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays four nuisance‑designation appeals after dispute over evidence; hearing set for July 1
Summary
The board held four nuisance‑premises appeals (including 4937 N. 30th) for further briefing and witness lists after defense counsel disputed whether police reports alone established that shooters were associated with the premises. The board set a July 1 hearing and a briefing and witness schedule.
A procedural dispute over how the Milwaukee Police Department’s investigative reports are used in nuisance‑premises hearings prompted the Administrative Review Board on April 15 to hold four nuisance‑designation appeals, including the matter for 4937 North 30th Street, and set a schedule for written submissions and witness lists ahead of a July 1 hearing.
At issue: association with the premises
The city sought chronic nuisance determinations based on police reports documenting shootings and related calls at several addresses. The city’s administrative letter summarized incidents and relied on police reports and computer‑aided dispatch records; officers authenticated those reports in the hearing record. Defense counsel said the board must have evidence that the persons who engaged in the nuisance activity were “persons associated with the premises” as defined in the municipal code — and requested live testimony so counsel could cross‑examine witnesses about association with the property.
Officer Chandler of Milwaukee Police District 7 authenticated police reports regarding incidents at 4937 N. 30th. The city attorney said the department’s paper review of investigations supports the nuisance designation; defense counsel said the reports do not establish the requisite connection between the people involved in shootings and the property owner or occupants. The board and parties discussed whether the reports and the city’s summary letter were sufficient or whether witnesses should be produced.
Scheduling and deadlines
The board agreed to hold appeals numbered 23–26 for additional preparation and set a new hearing date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025. The parties agreed to this schedule and a limited submission timetable:
- City: any additional briefs or materials to be submitted by May 30, 2025. - Appellants/defense: responses and witness lists due by June 9, 2025. - Appellants may provide their witness lists by June 15, 2025 (board asked parties to identify witness names and a one‑line summary of anticipated testimony).
The board also instructed DNS/city counsel to email board members and staff copies of submitted materials in advance to ensure members who will be out of the country or otherwise unavailable receive them.
Why it matters: nuisance‑premises designations can trigger additional regulatory steps and owners’ obligations to abate. The procedural questions raised in this hearing concern how much the board can rely on police reports and agency summaries in deciding whether nuisance activity was committed by persons associated with a property, versus needing live testimony or subpoenaed witnesses.
Next steps: parties will use the submitted timeline to prepare briefs and witness lists; the board said it will allow witnesses to appear by Zoom. The board also noted it will hear the four nuisance appeals on July 1, with time slots reserved to reduce wait time for witnesses and counsel.
