Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Health Committee advances substitute to create associate‑level speech‑language pathology assistant

2923838 · April 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Health Committee approved a substitute bill Wednesday to establish an associate‑level speech‑language pathology assistant, advancing the measure out of committee after debate over supervision limits, practicum requirements and which colleges may participate.

Health Committee members voted Wednesday to approve a substitute bill to create an associate‑level speech‑language pathology assistant and gave the measure a favorable committee report.

Supporters described the substitute as a step to expand the pipeline of practitioners who work with children and other clients in schools and clinical settings. The committee debated supervision limits, required practicum hours and whether the measure should initially be limited to a single community‑college pilot before broader adoption.

Representative Mooney moved adoption of the substitute; Representative Gray seconded the motion, and the committee approved the substitute and advanced the bill out of committee. Representatives later moved and seconded a motion to report the bill favorably as a substitute; Representative Brinyard provided the second for that motion. The transcript does not record a roll‑call vote tally for the final favorable report.

Committee members and outside witnesses focused on several technical details. The substitute requires 100 practicum hours and 30 semester credit hours in speech and hearing sciences as part of eligibility language included in the draft. Witnesses and members discussed supervision limits: the draft increases the maximum number of assistants or students supervised by a licensed speech‑language pathologist from the state's current standard to allow up to three under the substitute, reflecting a national standard cited during committee discussion.

Vicky Karlowitz, identified in the meeting as president of Wallace State Community College in Hanceville, told the committee that "the speech and language pathologist would not supervise more than 3 assistants at any 1 time," and said students in programs would generally count toward that supervision cap.

Several members raised concerns about whether the Legislature can or should specify which higher‑education institutions may participate in training programs. Representative Warren questioned the committee's authority to restrict program inventories, noting that degree programs must be added to an institution's inventory and approved by the Commission on Higher Education. The transcript records affirmations that Commission on Higher Education approval—referred to in discussion as ACHE—would be part of the institutional process for new or expanded programs.

The substitute includes language, according to committee discussion, intended to limit immediate implementation to a single community‑college program as a pilot (Wallace State), with the expectation that the pilot could be expanded later if demand warrants. Committee members requested clearer draft language to state that intent; supporters said they would work on a friendly amendment for floor consideration to clarify pilot status and opportunity for other colleges to participate.

Representative Shiree introduced an amendment to create a separate category for four‑year students (language intended to name bachelor‑level students differently from assistants); that amendment was moved, then a motion to table the amendment passed after a voice vote—committee members counted four nays during that tabling action—and the amendment was left off the substitute.

Committee discussion included practical concerns about supervision capacity: members asked whether increasing the number of assistants would meaningfully expand workforce capacity if licensed supervisors in some settings remain limited in how many people they can oversee. Supporters and witnesses replied that school systems in particular expect to be able to utilize additional assistants and that the cap of three was consistent with national standards and professional guidance.

After the questions and debate, the committee adopted the substitute and reported the bill favorably. The transcript records members saying "aye" and later "Now it passes," but it does not provide a full roll‑call tally for the final committee report.

The measure will proceed under normal legislative procedures from committee; the transcript does not specify a date for floor consideration or additional amendments.