Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Equity Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews teaching-and-learning findings from equity audit; district reports steps to implement Hopkins Learning Framework
Summary
The Hopkins Public School Board received an update April 8 on the teaching-and-learning portion of a district equity audit and heard administrators describe multi-year implementation steps including a districtwide learning framework, a schoolwide enrichment model and stronger EL–literacy alignment.
The Hopkins Public School Board received an update April 8 on the teaching-and-learning findings from an equity audit conducted during the pandemic and heard district leaders describe multi-year steps taken to address the auditors’ recommendations.
Assistant Director and teaching-and-learning lead Doctor Ertle summarized the timeline and follow-up work since the audit: creation of a Hopkins Learning Framework (a coherent districtwide instructional approach), research and development of a schoolwide enrichment model, and several hires to shore up multilingual and literacy coordination. “The equity audit was presented in September of 2021,” Ertle said, and the district has since aligned staffing and programming to address the audit’s calls for clearer curriculum maps, culturally pluralized curriculum and consistent instructional practice.
Why it matters
The audit’s purpose was to identify gaps in curriculum, instruction and access and recommend steps to reduce disproportionality in achievement. Trustees and staff emphasized that structural change takes time and that measurable gains depend on consistent implementation, monitoring and adjustments.
Key follow-ups described to the board
- Hopkins Learning Framework: Developed to provide a coherent, inquiry- and concept-based approach across grades K–12 so teaching strategies and curricular focuses are consistent districtwide. Ertle said the framework was designed “to provide a coherent and equitable experience for students e through 12.” - Schoolwide enrichment model: After multi-year research and training (including Renzulli Institute work), the district began installing tier-1, schoolwide enrichment this year with oversight from a principal on special assignment; a fuller status update was promised later in the school year. - English-learners and literacy alignment: The district has added staff roles and emphasized integrated EL and literacy support. Ertle described the shift to connect EL with districtwide literacy work so services are not siloed and to provide clearer documentation and accountability for EL services.
Board reaction and remaining concerns
Board members expressed cautious support for the steps while acknowledging slow-moving progress on stubborn achievement gaps. Trustee Sharon Dreesen asked whether the audit’s findings about parent-group divisions and curriculum representation were addressed; Ertle noted that earlier nonconcurrence votes had been connected to COVID-era access issues and that some PTO structures have since been adjusted under school leadership to be more inclusive. Dr. Mary Pirie Reid framed the work in equity terms: “the measure of any organization is how well we serve our most vulnerable students,” she said, urging sustained focus on tiered supports and implementation fidelity.
No board action was taken; the session was an informational update and the administration said it would continue to bring progress reports and program reviews (for example, an upcoming deeper report on math curriculum review).
Ending
Board members asked for continued measurement and explicit progress checks; administrators said future agenda items will include program-review timelines, implementation fidelity reports and updates on school-based enrichment installation.
