Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety And Youth topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council asks staff to draft ordinance restricting alcohol advertising near schools and youth facilities

2905052 · April 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Garden Grove City Council voted to ask staff to prepare an ordinance that would limit alcohol and drug advertising near schools, parks and youth recreation areas; the motion passed 6‑yes, 1‑abstain and staff said constitutional issues will be researched before drafting the ordinance.

The Garden Grove City Council voted Tuesday to direct staff to draft an ordinance restricting alcohol and drug advertising near schools, parks and youth recreational facilities and return to the council for consideration.

Councilmember [name on record as] Bridal introduced the request, saying a mural advertising alcohol near youth centers and schools raised concern. After discussion about constitutional constraints, the council approved a motion to have staff research legal viability and prepare an ordinance; the vote recorded six yes votes with one abstention.

Why it matters: Councilmembers said the proliferation of alcohol advertising near schools and youth spaces is a public‑health and community concern, and they want the city attorney and staff to explore regulatory options while taking First Amendment limits into account.

Council direction and legal considerations

A councilmember noted the mural in question appears on private property adjacent to a youth facility and asked staff to explore whether the city’s code can limit advertising in close proximity to schools and youth centers. City staff and the city attorney cautioned that restrictions on signage and murals can raise First Amendment issues and will require legal research and carefully drafted language if the council wishes to pursue an ordinance.

Council action and vote

The motion to direct staff to draft an ordinance and return with recommended language passed with six yes votes and one abstention; the council requested the city attorney research potential constitutional limits and statutory approaches before an ordinance is prepared.

Next steps

City staff said the research and drafting will take time; the council member who initiated the request said she would like staff to bring back an ordinance for a future meeting if legal analysis supports that approach. The council also discussed an interim, voluntary outreach approach of sending a letter to the business owner asking for changes while staff studies regulatory options.

The council did not adopt an ordinance at Tuesday’s meeting; it only directed staff to prepare one if legally feasible and to report back.