Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
El Cajon council approves lowest bid for city signage project after contractor protest
Summary
A local construction firm protested the recommended award for the Marquis Insulation signage project, saying the low bid omitted technical requirements and vastly undercut the city estimate. Council voted unanimously to accept staff's recommendation to proceed with the low bidder after staff and legal review.
El Cajon city council voted unanimously April 8 to accept staff recommendations and proceed with the lowest bidder on Bid No. 0To25, the Marquis Insulation signage project, despite a formal protest from a competing contractor.
A representative who identified himself from Ayuma House Planning and Construction urged the council to reconsider the award, saying the apparent low bid failed to account for technical requirements and underestimated true costs. "The estimated bid for this project is $250,000, where the lowest bidder is only $51,000," the speaker said, arguing that missing wall-condition information, special installation tools, required sign frames and long electrical conduit runs would raise the true project cost well above the low bid.
City staff told the council that purchasing and legal staff had reviewed the protest and the low bid. "You can't reject because of a feeling," a staff member said during the discussion, summarizing the legal limitation on rejecting a responsive low bid solely because it looks unusually low. Staff also said the awarded firm had confirmed it stood by its submitted price and that required bonds for labor, materials and performance will cover the city's remedy if the firm fails to complete the work.
Council members questioned whether the low bidder had relevant public-works experience and whether prevailing-wage and permit requirements had been considered. Purchasing staff indicated prior work that appeared similar and said the procurement review included checks on compliance. Council discussion emphasized that, under current procurement rules and the materials submitted by bidders, staff lacked a legal basis to reject the lowest responsive bid.
After the exchange, a council member moved to "accept the recommendations as listed in the staff report." The motion carried unanimously.
The city will proceed with award to the lowest responsive bidder and rely on contract bonds and standard procurement remedies if problems arise during construction.
Clarifying details: The protest referenced an estimated project cost of $250,000 and a lowest bid of $51,000; the procurement process will require performance and payment bonds equal to the contract amount and retains the city's usual appeals and contracting remedies.
