Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Health.regulation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel advances technical corrections to Board of Animal Health and veterinary licensing statute

5840173 · March 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A technical agency bill to move background check and administrative functions to the Board of Animal Health's new Center for Animal Policy cleared committee after the board's general counsel explained FBI requested clarifications.

House Bill 1354 contains technical revisions to the statutes governing the Board of Animal Health (BOA) and the Board of Veterinary Medicine (BVM), aligning criminal background check disclosures and administrative support with the boards’ updated organizational structure.

Representative Michael Aylesworth, the bill sponsor, said the changes are intended to bring statute language into conformity with current practice after the BVM was relocated and co‑located with BOA under the newly formed Center for Animal Policy. Sarah Simpson, general counsel for the Board of Animal Health, told the committee the Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reviewed earlier statutory changes and requested additional clarifying language to meet federal standards for criminal history record information.

Simpson said the FBI asked that certain statutory references clearly include "registered" or "permitted" categories in addition to licenses, and that references to the state and national background checks be explicit because the fingerprints are routed first to the state police and then to the FBI. She also said the FBI asked that the statute avoid authorizing private entities to receive criminal history record information and requested explicit language identifying board employees authorized to perform relevant activities.

Simpson said the amendments do not change practitioner requirements; they only update cross‑references and the release language for criminal background checks so the BOA can receive the information directly and perform administrative duties that formerly were handled by the Professional Licensing Agency. She said PLA and the state police cooperated on the final language.

The committee adopted the agency amendment by consent, later moved the bill and recorded a unanimous committee vote. Recorded roll call entries show the bill passed committee with nine yeas and no nays.