Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City clerk outlines 2025 school‑board appointment schedule; council to hold public hearings and June interviews
Summary
City Clerk Alicia Femi walked council through the schedule and process for three upcoming school‑board appointments, including public hearings in May, interviews between June 10 and June 24 and final appointments June 24 pending background checks.
Get email alerts on the Education Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Clerk Alicia Femi presented the timeline and process for the 2025 Lynchburg School Board appointments at the April 8 works session.
Femi said three terms expire this year (one per district) and the incumbents — Anthony Andrews (District 1), Dr. Martin Day (District 2) and Gloria Preston (District 3) — are eligible to apply for reappointment. The city will accept applications until the first public hearing; state code requires the names of candidates to be read into the record.
Staff proposed a public hearing on May 13 with an option to hold a second hearing to allow more applicants; council could begin selecting candidates at the close of that hearing. The recommended schedule includes a final candidate selection on June 10 under general business, interview blocks between June 10 and June 24 (typically open, livestreamed interviews of ~30 minutes each) and final appointments on June 24, contingent on state and national background checks.
Femi described the standard application form and said residency (ward/district) is captured but that the city does not currently require applicants to provide documentary proof of residency; she confirmed staff will examine options for verifying residency. Councilmembers discussed whether to use a ballot method (similar to mayor/vice‑mayor selection) versus the current motion/second approach for appointments; staff offered to provide options and draft process language for council consideration at the June 10 meeting.
Ending: Council asked staff to provide options on voting procedure (motion/second vs. ballot method) and to consider simple residency verification; staff said it would circulate the schedule and materials to council and present voting‑method options for a June decision.

