Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Youth Sports Field Allocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parks staff propose lottery, summer trial to allocate Santa Clara practice fields
Summary
City parks staff presented a proposal to allocate practice fields by lottery and run a June–August trial to reduce conflicts among youth and adult soccer and softball groups. The plan sets priority windows, two-hour time blocks and requirements for on-site representation; fall fees would be reinstated if the trial is adopted.
Get email alerts on the Youth Sports Field Allocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Santa Clara parks staff proposed a new lottery system and a summer trial to allocate practice fields among youth and adult teams, saying the change is intended to make field assignments more consistent as requests increase.
Under the plan, staff would run a live draft-style lottery in which each organization must be present to receive a ticket and draw a number. Selections would proceed in a “snake” order (first through last, then back) and allot field time in two-hour blocks. Staff said Field 1 would be split into Field 1A and 1B to increase capacity.
Parks staff described a three-month pilot for practice permits in June, July and August to test the process before the fall season. They proposed ending the summer permitting period on Aug. 15 and beginning fall permits on Aug. 16 through Dec. 31. Staff said fees will be waived for the summer trial and that fall fees — if the process remains — would be implemented in the fall permitting cycle.
The draft priority calendar in the discussion would allow priority groups 1 and 2 (city programs and resident youth nonprofits) to submit requests on April 1; adult nonprofits and resident adult groups (priority groups 3 and 4) would be included in the next round. Staff noted that when multiple organizations share the same priority level the lottery would determine order among them.
Staff recommended three evening practice blocks — 4–6 p.m., 6–8 p.m. and 8–10 p.m. — after consulting coaches. They also recommended treating some fields as half-fields so more “little” (younger) teams can practice simultaneously, and said staff will consider age-group limits per field to avoid excessive wear.
The discussion addressed recurring operational issues: no-shows, cancellations that leave empty fields, camps or clinics booked as “practices,” and conflicts between Arbiter (a scheduling system used by some leagues) and the city’s internal reservation records. Parks staff said Arbiter is not the city’s official reservation record; the city maintains a separate reservations schedule. Staff proposed distributing official permit PDFs to coaches (and suggested keeping a printed permit at the field or a viewable calendar) to make it easier to show proof of reservation on site.
Enforcement and communication were raised repeatedly. Staff encouraged groups to photograph unauthorized users and send the images to parks staff so the city can track organizations that repeatedly use fields without permits. They also described the front desk at the community center as the initial phone contact during business hours and said parks staff will attempt outreach; however, they acknowledged that reduced weekend staffing limits parks’ ability to patrol fields regularly.
Staff described pragmatic flexibility for organizations: once each group has selected the fields needed during the lottery, groups can negotiate swaps among themselves that must be finalized before leaving the meeting so the staff can record the final map. Staff also noted that some current large users — including Santa Clara Youth Soccer and other recurring groups — would remain on the schedule by priority, and that new groups would need to wait for the next permitting cycle and submit qualification documents to be considered.
As next steps, staff indicated they will finalize the field-allocation document, continue internal coordination with scheduling staff, and arrange a meeting of user groups to conduct the draft lottery in the coming weeks; one tentative date discussed was April 24 at 6 p.m.
The proposal did not include a formal vote in the recorded discussion. Several operational details remain to be decided — whether to impose a formal no-show cancellation fee, exact enforcement authority for on-site removal of unauthorized users, and how to integrate game scheduling in Arbiter with the city’s reservation system.
The changes are intended to reduce overbooking and perceived favoritism in allocations, and to make expectations clearer to coaches, leagues and parks staff before the fall season when fees are expected to resume.

