Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Infrastructure Bchip topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Prop 1 implementation: LAO flags regional inequities in BCHIP awards; DHCS says bond round review underway

2899226 · April 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Legislative Analyst's Office told the Assembly subcommittee that earlier BCHIP awards concentrated new capacity in regions with lower RAND‑estimated need, and DHCS said it's addressing gaps, has received $8 billion in applications for $3.3 billion in current bond funding, and is preparing awards and technical assistance.

The Assembly heard an overview of Proposition 1 changes and an assessment of the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program (BCHIP) from the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) and the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS).

Will Owens of the LAO summarized alterations under Proposition 1, including changes to oversight roles and removal of certain "innovation" buckets, and noted Proposition 1 expanded the Oversight and Accountability Commission from 16 to 27 voting members and redirected some prevention guidance to the Department of Public Health.

Mark Newton of the LAO presented an assessment of BCHIP rounds 1–5 and wrote that, while over half of awards served predominantly Medi‑Cal enrollees, the distribution of newly added adult inpatient capacity had tended to concentrate in four regions that RAND estimated had the least need and that the Southern San Joaquin Valley — identified as highest‑need in RAND's analysis — had not gained new inpatient capacity. Newton urged more detail on benefits to children and youth, American Indian and Alaska Native populations, and justice‑involved individuals, and recommended lowering barriers for smaller and disadvantaged counties to apply.

DHCS Chief of Community Services Marlise Perez said DHCS awarded roughly $1.7 billion in prior BCHIP rounds and has funded 223 distinct mental‑health or substance‑use facilities across 130 projects. Perez said DHCS has received nearly $8 billion in BCHIP bond applications for a $3.3 billion tranche it is in the process of awarding; she told the committee DHCS expected to make announcements in May and to run an additional funding round later.

On outreach and equity, DHCS said it has been providing technical assistance and planning grants to rural counties and tribal entities and noted a tribal set‑aside. Perez emphasized DHCS's focus on Medi‑Cal populations and campus or regional models intended to support step‑down care and rural partnerships.

Assemblymember Patterson raised concerns about letters of support and local collaboration, particularly for projects involving tribal organizations. DHCS said its request for application requires letters of support but that the agency will accept applications without a county behavioral health director letter; DHCS also said tribal entities are treated differently because federally recognized tribes are sovereign and may have different funding structures.

The LAO recommended that the legislature ask DHCS for more granular reporting on which populations and regions benefited and consider whether the regional allocation methodology perpetuates existing inequities. Multiple county and provider speakers in public comment urged continued prioritization of regional needs and asked the legislature to restore a proposed cut to a Behavioral Health Bridge Housing round (round 4), saying gaps could produce housing instability for clients.