Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and commissioners spar over leaked moratorium, legal review and transparency in Bonner County
Summary
Public comment at the Bonner County meeting focused on a recent moratorium on minor land divisions, a reported leak of related information, and the county's legal review. Speakers disagreed about the board's handling; the legal opinion was referred to the Idaho Attorney General according to meeting remarks.
A dispute over a recently adopted moratorium on minor land divisions and a leaked document drew extended public comment and exchanges between residents and county officials at the Bonner County Board of Commissioners meeting.
Resident John Dupree said he was concerned about process and optics after an emergency meeting on the moratorium and asked that county actions follow public procedures. "I think he was right that we probably ought to have it through the process and not an emergency thing," Dupree said during public comment.
George Garrett (recorded in the transcript as George Garrett, Barnarkami) voiced support for the moratorium and criticized earlier policy choices, saying past decisions allowed what he described as problematic land divisions and "spot zoning." Garrett asked several questions about who leaked information about the moratorium and whether a local party had received it.
A county official told the meeting the matter has been elevated to the Idaho Attorney General and that the county had received a legal opinion supporting the action taken by the board. The official said the Attorney General's office is now the appropriate authority to assess consequences and any potential legal actions. The official also referenced that the county's prosecutor may have a role in filing matters with the Attorney General.
Several residents and commenters expressed mixed views: some welcomed the moratorium and the board's legal review, while others said they were upset about how information was shared and about transparency. Dave Bowman, a Bonner County resident, and other speakers recommended public engagement opportunities and noted partisan reaction from local political groups.
Separately, a member of the public and a commissioner both noted that the planning department's public-facing list of current minor land-division applications did not appear to include seven minor land-division applications that members of the public expected to see; the board said it would request the planning director to review and, if appropriate, update the website or explain why the items were not posted.
Board members also said they intend to pursue a peer review of the county comprehensive plan to check for completeness and consistency; the move toward an outside review was raised during the district commissioner updates and received support from at least one public speaker.
No formal votes were recorded on the moratorium itself during the meeting; the county official said the legal opinion supporting the action had been provided to the board and that the Attorney General's office had been asked to review related matters. Public commenters signaled they would return for further discussion at future meetings.
