Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Panel Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances rule change letting Ethics Panel issue public closure reports and statements
Summary
The House ordered third reading for HR6, a resolution amending House rules to allow the House Ethics Panel to issue brief public statements and nonidentifying closure reports summarizing allegations and dispositions; the change is intended to increase transparency while preserving confidentiality where required.
Get email alerts on the Ethics Panel Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Vermont House on April 8 ordered third reading of HR6, a resolution amending House rules to permit the House Ethics Panel to issue public comments and closure reports about complaints without identifying complainants or respondents.
Representative Bartholomew, speaking for the House Rules Committee, told members the proposal is intended to increase transparency in the panel’s work. The committee reported a unanimous 7–0 vote in favor of the resolution.
Under the rule changes described in the committee report, the panel may issue a brief statement confirming the existence of an investigation when the matter is already generally known through independent sources and public interest or speculation could threaten confidence in the panel. The panel's closure reports would provide a summary of complaint allegations, the final disposition and the basis for that disposition; the reports would not identify complainants, respondents or other persons by name and would be maintained in a registry on the panel’s webpage.
The resolution also codifies confidentiality rules for panel members and staff while specifying narrow circumstances in which information may be disclosed: by court order to a court of competent jurisdiction; to a state or federal law enforcement agency provided the agency agrees to maintain confidentiality; or to members or staff of the House discrimination prevention panel or harassment prevention panel when necessary to inform an investigation and if confidentiality is maintained. The committee report states records produced under these rules would not be subject to the Vermont Public Records Act.
Representative Bartholomew said the changes align House rules with statutes that require the ethics panel to report a general description of complaint topics to the Vermont State Ethics Commission. He emphasized that HR6 applies only to the House Ethics Panel and not to the House Discrimination Prevention Panel or the House Harassment Prevention Panel.
The full House voted by voice to order the resolution for third reading.

