Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kennett officials present multi‑phase plan to expand high‑school cafeteria and add spectator gym; administrators say cost and schedule require phased approach
Summary
Architects presented a two‑phase concept to expand Kennett High School’s cafeteria with a mezzanine over the existing dining area and to build a new two‑court spectator gym, but administrators said cost, schedule and the need for an alternative gym during construction make phasing and financing critical.
Get email alerts on the Facilities Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kennett Consolidated School District administrators and architects presented a concept plan to expand the high‑school cafeteria and eventually add a new spectator gym and circulation improvements; the committee described the proposals as aspirational and said any construction would require phased financing and careful scheduling.
The proposal, prepared by Breslin Architects, centers on two linked projects:
1) Cafeteria mezzanine: Create a two‑level dining and flexible learning space by building a mezzanine over the existing cafeteria and re‑using the auxiliary (AUX) gym volume above the cafeteria. Renderings show amphitheater‑style steps, daylight from upper windows, and adjacent small group instruction rooms carved from underused locker rooms. Administration estimated a construction cost around $6 million for the cafeteria component alone, and said the AUX gym would be unavailable for up to 12 months during construction.
2) New spectator gym: A later phase would build a two‑court spectator gym on the footprint currently used by maintenance and transportation operations (the district’s bus/maintenance garage). The scheme would include a below‑grade pedestrian corridor that connects the new addition to the tech/annex wing so students could move indoors between buildings. The spectator gym concept showed about 1,200 spectator seats and two full basketball courts. The addition was presented with an estimated cost in the high tens of millions (architect estimates cited roughly $29 million for the addition and higher all‑in figures depending on relocation costs).
Operational and fiscal constraints
Administration emphasized tradeoffs and constraints:
- The AUX gym is used regularly and cannot be taken offline without alternative space; administrators told the committee the high school could not preserve its current schedule without access to the AUX gym for the projected 12‑month construction window, making the cafeteria‑only approach difficult unless an alternative gym is found or built first.
- District capital reserves total roughly $26 million. Administration said the district could fund the cafeteria from reserves but cautioned against depleting capital reserves because other medium‑term projects (roofs, building automation, site stormwater) are already scheduled in the five‑year plan.
- Construction sequencing, stormwater management and parking/traffic impacts will affect cost and schedule; the new gym would require relocation of maintenance and transportation functions to a separate facility, adding cost.
Board and staff reaction
Board members described the plan as attractive but noted competing priorities. Several members said they favored the cafeteria concept as a way to improve student daily experience but warned that the full project (cafeteria plus gym) would likely require multi‑year financing, borrowings or a voter referendum. Administration noted some debt could be structured over time, but borrowing for the gym first would add years to delivery and complicate near‑term scheduling.
Why it matters
The proposal addresses persistent daily issues — cramped cafeteria seating and the district’s inability to stage a full‑school assembly in one gym — but would be a major capital undertaking. Administrators flagged a multi‑year timeline for the gym and several immediate operational questions about where students and programs would be housed during construction. The committee asked for additional usage studies and a time study of Reynolds and AUX gym scheduling before committing to a phased plan.
Next steps
Administration said it would conduct additional analysis, including a time‑use study of gym and cafeteria operations, explore creative scheduling and consider whether incremental options or limited temporary reconfigurations could provide relief. Any formal project would require board approval, refined cost estimates, and decisions about funding sources and sequencing.

