Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Remodel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Single Family Design Board continues Raymer Ranch remodel to May 5 for more window and landscaping study
Summary
The Single Family Design Board continued project design approval for a major remodel and additions at 557 Raymer Ranch to May 5, directing the applicant to rework window proportions (notably on the south elevation), provide a fuller landscape plan, and supply material samples and inspiration photos.
Get email alerts on the Residential Remodel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Single Family Design Board continued the item for project design approval for the remodel and additions at 557 Raymer Ranch to the May 5 meeting, citing the need for further study of window proportions, south‑facing glazing, and a more complete landscape and material presentation.
Why it matters: the project proposes substantial exterior work (as‑built additions, new windows and doors, new pool and retaining walls) on a hillside lot. Board members expressed concern about the apparent imbalance of glazing and mullion patterns on the south elevation, inconsistent window proportions across elevations, and the visual impact of a high retaining wall on the west side of the proposed pool area.
Applicant representatives described efforts to restore some of the original design intent while resolving as‑built discrepancies; they said many of the existing exterior trim elements and columns were altered during prior work and that the proposed revisions aim to improve weatherproofing and structural safety. The team also proposed a darker retaining‑wall color (Sherwin‑Williams “Evergreen Fog”) and vegetation including native buckwheat and Pittosporum/other screening to stabilize slopes and soften retaining walls.
Board directions focused on three items: (1) re‑study window proportions and mullion patterns across all elevations—emphasis on the south elevation where glazing currently appears dominant; (2) return with a fuller landscape plan that shows proposed screening and planting sizes (the board specifically requested that proposed hedging be shown as 15‑gallon stock where appropriate); and (3) provide context photos, precedent imagery, and specific material/color samples for the board to evaluate harmonization with the neighborhood and hillside context. The board continued the item to the May 5 meeting date (or earlier if the applicant chooses). The motion passed unanimously.

