Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Prevailing Wage And Payroll Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to expand certified-payroll disclosures draws sharp split: unions say boost will fight wage theft; contractors cite privacy and organizing risks
Summary
Senate Bill 287 would expand what must appear in certified payroll reports on public works to include daily and overtime hours and worker addresses and would permit joint labor-management committees to access that information for compliance investigations.
Senate Bill 287 returned to the Committee on Government Affairs for a hearing focused on certified payroll reports used on public works projects. The bill, presented by representatives of construction labor unions, would add the total number of hours and overtime hours worked each day and each week to the information contractors must keep, and would allow joint labor-management committees and Taft‑Hartley trust funds access to that information, including the address of a worker who has provided a driver’s license or ID.
Nick Visiliades, speaking for the Southwestern Regional Council of Carpenters, summarized the change as a standardization of information that some local jurisdictions already collect. "Local jurisdictions are already providing addresses and overtime data," he told the committee. "We want to make sure every jurisdiction provides a minimum set of information so compliance can be enforced." Boris Gresley of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters added that joint labor-management committees use certified payrolls to investigate wage theft and help recover wages and penalties for workers.
Proponents acknowledged sensitivity concerns and said they were open to amendments to remove access to driver license numbers and to limit use of the data. Patty McCarron of the Carpenters Contractors Cooperation Committee stressed that joint committees use home visits and off‑site meetings to allow workers to speak safely about wage violations and that the committees have helped recover tens of millions of dollars in wages.
Opponents — including the Associated Builders and Contractors, Associated General Contractors and several trade groups on the phone — argued the change would expose workers’ addresses and personal identifiers to groups that could use the information for organizing or to harass employers and employees. Mac Bybee of the Associated Builders and Contractors said enforcement authority rests with the Labor Commissioner and that private labor-management groups are not the state’s enforcement arm. "House calls can be intimidating and unsettling," he said.
The Plumbing, Heating and Cooling Contractors of Nevada also objected to providing home addresses and other sensitive data. A caller from the trade group said: "There is absolutely no reason that we should have to provide home addresses and driver's license information. You don't need that information to do what you want to do."
Committee members asked detailed questions about how the hours would be reported when a worker is on multiple jobs in a day and whether federal funding or federal contract rules (for example on highway jobs) could be affected. Proponents said standard Department of Labor certified payroll templates already include many of the requested fields and that many jurisdictions already disclose addresses and overtime; they said they were willing to consider amendments to narrow confidential fields and to restrict access to specified compliance entities.
No vote was taken; proponents said they expected to circulate a conceptual amendment after the hearing.
Ending: The committee left the bill open for amendment and further work by interested parties on privacy protections and the exact scope of permitted recipients.
