Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monroe council hears proposals to ease historic property review, expand outreach and file notice of designation
Summary
City staff outlined how local and national historic designations are handled, recommended education and technical assistance for homeowners, filing notice of local designations with the register of deeds, and proposed expanding the Historic District Commission's review as a recommendation for more properties in registered districts.
City staff briefed the Monroe City Council on local and federal rules governing historic properties and presented three primary recommendations: reactivate the Historic District Commission (HDC) as an advocacy and technical resource, file notice of local historic designations with the county register of deeds, and expand HDC review for exterior renovations in National Register districts so the commission provides formal recommendations to property owners and staff.
Mark Cochran, assistant city manager and economic development director, explained the city maintains three National Register historic districts and 36 properties designated under the city’s local historic district ordinance. He said locally designated properties require a certificate of appropriateness from the HDC before a building permit can be issued; properties in federal (National Register) districts currently receive HDC recommendation in more limited circumstances.
“For these 36 properties the Historic District Commission is required to approve before a building permit,” Cochran said, noting the HDC also provides consulting support through retained historic preservation expertise. Cochran said the city has tried to streamline reviews and that many proposed repairs (for example, siding or window work) can be addressed with alternatives that preserve historic character without requiring costly replication of century‑old materials.
Council members discussed homeowner burdens and education. Councilwoman Kelly suggested community recognition programs and home tours to make preservation “fun,” and Councilwoman Michelle and others said cost and contractor availability can deter owners from following preservation recommendations. Councilwoman Bynon and others urged more homeowner education before any change in mandatory rules.
Staff proposed filing notices of local designation with the register of deeds so future buyers learn in title searches that they own a locally designated historic property, and to create an FAQ pamphlet and a contractor/resource list to help owners find appropriate tradespeople. Cochran also floated conditioning some city incentives — such as neighborhood enterprise zone (NEZ) abatements — on following historic rehabilitation recommendations as a “carrot” to encourage compliance.
No ordinance change was adopted Monday. Staff said the next steps would be policy-level choices by council: whether to insist on recommendations, expand required reviews, file notice of designation, or make financial incentives contingent on following HDC guidance. Staff also pointed to recently expanded state tax credit eligibility for residential historic rehabilitation as a potential owner incentive.
The council did not take formal votes on these recommendations; members asked staff to prepare materials, an FAQ for new owners and an outreach plan to neighborhoods with concentrations of historic properties.
