Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Performance Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission urged to weigh in on U.S. Copyright Office review of performance-rights organizations
Summary
Commissioners discussed a federal request for comment on performance-rights organizations and their licensing and payment practices, and recommended the commission consider a formal letter to the U.S. Copyright Office.
Get email alerts on the Performance Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner Strickland and staff reminded the commission of an ongoing U.S. Copyright Office policy review and request for comments on performance-rights organizations (PROs), licensing, and distribution practices.
Strickland summarized industry issues the request seeks to address, including attempts to detect and block artificial streaming (botnets, playlist manipulation, account hijacking) and opaque payment flows that can affect creators’ royalties. He said he planned to invite a BMI representative to a future meeting so commissioners could hear an industry perspective and better understand enforcement and compliance practices.
Erica Shamley urged commissioners to review the Copyright Office webpage and a staff email with background materials; commissioners noted two deadlines in the federal review process—an initial comment deadline (April 11 was noted during the meeting) and a later reply deadline in May (May 27 was mentioned). Shamley said the review affects businesses that play music (venues, restaurants) and musicians who depend on PRO revenue.
Commissioners discussed drafting a formal comment or letter from the commission or the city to the Copyright Office after hearing a presenter; several commissioners supported the idea of an official city-letter submission once the commission consolidates its recommendations.
Why it matters: changes in federal policy and PRO practices can affect how venues pay licensing fees and how royalties are distributed to Austin musicians and venues; local stakeholders—venues, musicians and promoters—could be directly affected by proposed federal policy changes.
Ending: Staff asked commissioners to review the federal request-for-comments link in the backup materials and to consider supplying input by the federal deadlines; commissioners planned to invite industry presenters in future meetings.
