Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Senate Appropriations Committee moves 34 measures to suspense file; Finance warns of budget risks
Summary
At a brief California State Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing, members placed 34 bills on the committee's suspense file after authors waived presentations. Department of Finance offered opening fiscal remarks; witnesses raised concerns about procurement changes in SB 70 and legislative-intent language in SB 688.
The Senate Committee on Appropriations moved 34 measures to the committee's suspense file at a hearing in Room 20 2 Hundred of The 0 Street Building, after authors waived presentation and the committee limited public testimony to fiscal issues.
Christian Beltran, a representative of the Department of Finance, provided opening remarks on the state's fiscal outlook, telling the committee the department "assesses nearly all bills that have a fiscal impact" and will share those analyses during the second-house process. He warned that while the governor's budget forecast does not reflect a recession, it "recognize[s] several risk factors that could negatively affect the economy and state revenues," including asset-price volatility and federal policy changes that could affect trade, immigration and health care.
The committee adopted its rules for the session without objection and then proceeded through its agenda. For each measure on the calendar the author waived presentation and the committee accepted public testimony on fiscal aspects where provided. After brief public testimony or lack of comment, the chair moved each measure to the suspense file without objection.
Notable testimony
Phil Vermulen, representing the Coalition of Small and Disabled Veteran Businesses, testified in opposition to SB 70. Vermulen said the bill would raise a purchasing threshold that historically allowed small and disabled-veteran businesses to make limited-state purchases. He said the program's threshold began at $50,000, was raised to $100,000 in 2012, and that the bill under consideration would raise it to $350,000. Vermulen said a call-two procurement process is used now and argued the program disproportionately benefits a small group of vendors: "70% of the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
