Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce Incentives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances changes to Remote Quality Jobs Act that loosen baseline health-plan requirements
Summary
House Bill 2746 would broaden which remote jobs qualify for a state 'quality jobs' incentive by removing a strict minimum employer premium contribution and narrowing exclusions; the committee passed the measure 6-4 after debate about coverage adequacy.
Get email alerts on the Workforce Incentives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee approved House Bill 2746 on a 6-4 vote. The bill revises definitions in the Remote Quality Jobs Investment Act to expand the types of health plans that can satisfy the program’s "quality jobs" requirements while excluding certain plans.
Sponsor Senator Howard said the bill "cleans up the definition as relates to the Remote Quality Jobs Investment Act," expanding the pool of qualifying plans but continuing to exclude two plan types: plans where the employer does not provide more than 50% of premium coverage and employee-assistance/health-sharing arrangements that lack comprehensive benefits. "There should be more plans, more availabilities on what would qualify," Howard said.
Opponents warned the change could allow significantly inferior coverage to qualify for the program. Senator Kurt asked whether the bill would permit plans that provide substantially less coverage than previous standards; Howard said the policy aims to expand options for remote jobs and noted the market would influence employer offerings. Committee members discussed whether the change would affect retirees covered by Medicare and whether participants in healthcare-sharing ministries would be eligible; Howard said such participants would not qualify if the employer does not pay at least 50% of premiums.
The committee recorded a 6-4 recommendation to pass. Supporters said the change enables remote jobs to be eligible in a wider range of sectors; critics called for clearer minimum standards to ensure quality coverage for employees.
