Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Providence Board of Contract and Supply approves dozens of bids, refers several items to City Council amid questions on local participation

2891695 · April 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its April 7 meeting the Providence Board of Contract and Supply opened and referred multiple bids, approved items 1–49 with several items sent to City Council for further review, and heard discussion about vendor eligibility, change orders and low local MBE participation.

The Providence City Board of Contract and Supply on April 7 opened multiple bids, approved items 1 through 49 on the Section A agenda (with several exceptions referred to the City Council), and moved multiple procurement matters through the procurement process after staff discussion and questions from board members.

The board, meeting with nine members present, voted to approve items 1–49 on a roll-call motion while referring items 9, 22, two subitems of item 30 (recorded as “30-2” and “30-3”), and item 34 to the City Council for further review. The board recorded eight ayes, one nay and three absences on the main bundle (8–1–3) and a separate tally of nine ayes and three absences on item 30 (9–0–3). Director DePina made the motion to approve; Director Richards seconded it.

Why it matters: the board’s actions advance multiple city contracts across departments — from public art and school signage to IT and public-works bids — and set further scrutiny by the City Council for selected items. Board members also raised operational concerns about contract change orders, vendor credentialing and the city’s low share of local MBE subcontracting for school construction projects.

Most significant approvals and referrals

- Opening of bids and referral: The meeting moved to the opening of bids (Section B) and staff read multiple procurement results into the record. For the Department of Art, Culture and Tourism’s public art project-manager contracts (two-year contracts with a one-year option) bidders included Spa Arts LLC ($44,000), Golob Art, LLC ($42,965) and Sunshine Enterprise USA, LLC ($44,000). Those bid amounts were read into the record by staff during the Section B opening of bids.

- School signage bids: For furnishing and installing school speed/flash signage at Saint Pfeiff Elementary School the board recorded three bids: Pardon Engineering Constructor LLC ($73,784), Rossi Electric Company ($94,000) and PayFac Corporation ($70,900).

- Information-technology bids: Barracuda-services-related bids were read; staff recorded Thief Thief Prime Tech Inc. (amount read as $327,446.78) and Southern Computer Warehouse ($282,358.66). (Exact contract scopes and final award decisions were not determined at the meeting.)

- Office of the Internal Auditor: Professional auditing and agreed-upon procedures proposals were read into the record. One bid listed CVIB CPA with a total contract figure entered as $705,000; a second bidder (listed as CLA in the record) had an amount that could not be clearly read in the transcript and is therefore listed as not specified.

- Department of Parks and public-works bids: The board read rebids for the Water Place Park amphitheater-stage improvements, including Marin Construction Company ($354,658) and Yvonne Masonry ($274,200). The previously advertised low bidder or earlier estimate also was mentioned in the record but not re-confirmed for award at the meeting.

- Water Supply Board and roadway work: Staff read multiple construction bids for water-supply work and roadway saw-cutting and concrete base repairs; one bidder, Ritchie Grama Lane Company, had a recorded amount of $2,997,375 for an accelerated lead-service-line replacement contract. Unit-price bids for other roadwork were read but not finalized at the meeting.

Actions and formal votes

- Election of chair for the meeting: Director Lupiena moved to elect themself chair for the meeting; Treasurer Shamari Husband seconded. The motion carried by voice vote and the chair presided over subsequent items.

- Referral of bids to clerk: After opening bids, the board voted to refer the submitted bids to the clerk’s office for processing (motion by Director DePina, seconded by Treasurer Husband; voice vote recorded as carried).

- Approval of advertisements: The board approved the advertising items listed in Section C and specifically approved advertising for item 6 from Section B (motion by Director Richards; second by Director Bellini; carried by voice vote).

- Approval of items 1–49 in Section A with referrals: On a roll-call vote the board approved items 1 through 49, with items 9, 22, 30-2, 30-3 and 34 referred to City Council. The roll-call produced a recorded result of nine ayes and three absences on item 30 and eight ayes, one nay and three absences on the remaining bundled matters. The motions were made by Director DePina and seconded by Director Richards; the clerk recorded the roll call.

Key discussion points and staff clarifications

- Vendor eligibility and single-source concerns: Board members questioned item 17 (a training-services contract) because staff said that, due to Department of Health credentialing, the listed vendor was currently the only credentialed provider eligible to supply the training. Staff said they would re-verify that no other vendor in the state met the credential requirement and had no reason to believe the statement was incorrect.

- Change orders and unforeseen conditions: Members pressed staff on change orders, citing an example at the police academy where removal of existing tile revealed an embedded foam/fabric layer under the tile. Staff reported asbestos testing on the affected area returned negative results; the recommended remediation was to lay quarter-inch plywood over the existing floor at roughly $5 per square foot to prepare for new flooring. Staff characterized this cost as an unforeseen condition that arose after work began.

- Translation and telecommunications services: The board discussed continuity and integration costs related to an incumbent translation/telecommunications vendor used across public-safety and other city departments. Staff said the service is integrated with the city’s dispatch/communications systems and that replacing it would be complex and potentially costly. Board members asked whether the city had run a competitive bid; staff said translation services had been bid previously but the incumbent’s integrated role and system compatibility remained a factor.

- Local MBE participation and purchasing rules: A board member reported year-to-date school-construction spending of approximately $130,000,000 with less than $4,000,000 going to MBEs having Providence city addresses. Staff explained that the current purchasing ordinance and the city’s bidding rules do not permit awarding based solely on a contractor’s address and that changing that approach would likely require City Council action or an ordinance revision; staff also noted some related hiring- and workforce-tracking programs (e.g., First Source and Building Futures) track local hiring rather than vendor mailing addresses.

What the board did not decide

- No final contract awards for many line items were made at the meeting; bids were opened and referred to the clerk’s office, and the board approved the bundled Section A items with the exceptions noted above. Several items were deferred or extended to the April 21 meeting, including the Providence City Hall elevator replacement and a building-energy reporting-software item from the Office of Sustainability.

Next steps and outlook

Staff will forward the bids to the clerk’s office for formal processing and provide additional documentation to the City Council on the referred items. The City Council will review items 9, 22, 30-2, 30-3 and 34 as requested by the Board of Contract and Supply. The board adjourned after approving minutes from the March 24 meeting and completing the agenda.

Ending note: The board’s meeting record shows procedural approval of multiple procurement items while flagging recurring policy questions around single-source eligibility, unforeseen construction change orders and the limits of current purchasing rules to prioritize local vendors or MBE participation.