Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ceoab Regranting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission allocates $30,000 for CEOAB regranting; awards to be finalized in contracts

2880386 · April 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Daggett County Commission approved making $30,000 available through the CEOAB regranting process to three projects or businesses (three awards of $10,000), with contract language to be developed and final execution contingent on county attorney review.

The Daggett County Commission voted to allocate $30,000 for the CEOAB regranting program and to proceed with extending the related contracts as they are developed. Commissioners and staff described the allocation as three awards of $10,000 each to applicants who had applied previously but were outside the original funding available at the time.

County staff said two applicants (named as runner‑ups in the regranting selection process) will receive awards and staff are working to identify a third. On the record, Peggy explained the regranting funds were reallocated to cover items the original award did not and that the money needed to be spent within specific program deadlines; the county will backfill the allocation in the next grant process as appropriate.

The motion to extend the CEOAB regranting contracts passed by voice vote. Commissioners noted the approvals are conditional on final contract language and review by the county attorney before execution. The county will prepare contracts for each award and will return to the county attorney for legal review prior to signing.

Clarifying details on the record indicate the $30,000 total will be distributed as three $10,000 awards to eligible applicants who had previously applied but were not fully funded. Staff said one of the runner‑ups declined because they could not make the required match and staff are pursuing additional eligible recipients.