Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policing Security Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews updated policies on relations with law enforcement and school security personnel; formal vote set for next meeting
Summary
Administration proposed non-substantive updates to Board policies 805.1 (relations with law enforcement) and 805.2 (school security personnel) to align language with school code and reporting requirements; the policies clarify memorandum of understanding practice, annual reporting and PCCD requirements. The board will vote in three weeks.
The governance committee reviewed updated language for policy 805.1 (relations with law enforcement agencies) and 805.2 (school security personnel) on April 3, a set of clarifying edits administration said are intended to align district policy with school code and current reporting requirements.
Administrators and policy authors said the revisions do not change the districts core practices but clarify legal citations, the annual process of reconciling incident data with local law enforcement and the memorandum of understanding (MOU) process that outlines responsibilities between the school district and local law enforcement partners. The revised 805.2 language also notes that third-party security vendors require approval by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) where applicable and clarifies the annual report content submitted to the Pennsylvania Department of Education, PCCD and the School Safety and Security Committee.
The committee discussed operational details such as annual incident-report reconciliation with local police and clarified the superintendents oversight of the safety-and-security coordinator. Board members asked procedural questions; Mr. Bruce asked whether the safety-and-security coordinator is a direct report to the superintendent and administration confirmed that reporting line by law is a superintendent-level report.
No substantive changes to operations were proposed; the committee scheduled the policies for a formal board vote at the next board meeting (noted during the committee as three weeks out). The draft policy language is publicly available on the districts agenda manager for review in advance of the vote.
