Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Late Hours Permit Appeal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dallas appeals board overturns denial and grants Club Los Realis a one-year late‑hours exemption
Summary
The City of Dallas Permanent License and Appeal Board voted unanimously Thursday to reverse the chief of police's denial and grant a one‑year exemption allowing Club Los Realis to operate past the city's late‑hours restriction.
Get email alerts on the Late Hours Permit Appeal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Dallas Permanent License and Appeal Board voted unanimously Thursday to reverse a denial by the chief of police and grant a one‑year exemption allowing Club Los Realis to operate past the city's standard late‑hours cutoff.
The board's decision came after the club's owners argued that the city's measurement showing the dance hall within 1,000 feet of a residence was taken from a different point than the business building's active entrance; the city maintained its zoning survey showed the nearest points were within the 1,000‑foot limit. The board granted a one‑year exemption from the 1,000‑foot restriction and approved a late‑hours permit.
Why it matters: Dallas City Code section 14‑3.1 prohibits issuing a late‑hours permit for a dance hall located within 1,000 feet of a lot devoted to residential use. The board's action is an administrative exception to that restriction for one year; the decision affects local nightlife licensing and how measurement disputes between applicants and the city are handled.
Owners' case Martha Luis, an owner of Club Los Realis, told the board the family business has operated in the area for nearly 17 years and typically opens only on Saturday nights. "We've been owning the business for it's a family and operated business. We've been in business for, almost 17 years this year," Luis said during her opening remarks. She and her family members described on‑site security and steps they say they have taken to limit noise and disturbances, including fencing and the use of sound‑dampening insulation applied in the roof and walls.
Luis said the property is roughly a five‑acre lot with a large parking area and that the city measurement relied on a point in the middle of the parcel rather than the building entrance where people arrive and where sound would more likely escape. She told the board she and others used aerial photos and a drone to measure from the building entrance to the nearest residential boundary and that one of her measurements showed roughly 1,050 feet from the building to the closest property line cited by the city. "It was a thousand and, 50 feet, I believe, from, our new point of measurement, which is our actual building, to that property line on 3529, Detonte Street," she said.
Owners also described their operations: the venue opens at about 9 p.m., sells alcohol until 2 a.m., and the gates and on‑site activity generally end by about 4 a.m. The owners said they employ an on‑site security team and that the taco stand on the property is owned by the family. They also described community activities, including food distribution during 2020 and holiday events.
City's case The city argued the denial was proper under section 14‑3.1 because a city land survey and zoning review showed the nearest point of the dance hall to a residential lot line was within 1,000 feet. "No late hours permit may be issued for a dance hall located within 1,000 feet of the property line of a lot devoted to residential use," city representative Sherry Sitnik told the board in her opening statement, citing the code and urging the board to affirm the chief's denial.
Detective testimony and enforcement history Detective Monreal of the Dallas Police Department's vice unit told the board he reviewed the application, visited the property and the surrounding area, and found no police reports tying the club to disturbances during operating hours. "No. I don't. Actually, I think through the research that I did, this property had no police reports generated for a whole year," Monreal said. He told the board that some of the noise complaints in the neighborhood had been traced to another nearby business, which police and code enforcement later closed for after‑hours violations.
Board discussion and outcome Board member Michael Hayes moved to overrule the chief of police's denial and grant a one‑year exemption; the motion was seconded by board member Quinn (seconding confirmed during the hearing). Board members who spoke in favor cited the detective's lack of enforcement incidents and the owners' mitigation efforts. Vice Chair Torres also supported the motion. After no board members spoke in opposition, the board voted and the motion passed unanimously.
The board asked members to watch for DocuSign paperwork and concluded the hearing at 10:08 a.m.
What the board did not decide and next steps The board's exemption applies for one year and does not change how the city measures the statutory 1,000‑foot limit; several board members noted the recurring measurement dispute and suggested the issue may need city‑level clarification. The board did not find other code or safety grounds to deny the permit, and the city indicated the denial was automatic if the survey showed a residence within 1,000 feet. The owners will receive the necessary paperwork to complete the exemption process.
