Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting Systems topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee passes SB 526 after adopting vendor‑friendly amendment; proposed Unicode requirement fails
Summary
Senate Bill 526, which addresses voting‑system identifier requirements, passed the committee 9–4 after a sponsor amendment softened a must‑to‑may requirement. A separate amendment to require ASCII/Unicode support for candidate name characters failed 4–9.
The House Elections and Apportionment Committee approved Senate Bill 526 as amended, moving language about voting‑system identifier fields and related formatting standards that vendors must support. Sponsor Senator Gaskell offered amendment number 2 to change a mandatory requirement to permissive language and to delete a line requiring a specific identifier marker. The amendment was adopted by roll call, 9–4.
Representative Boye offered an amendment to require voting systems to support ASCII or Unicode character sets so candidate names that include accent marks, tildes or other diacritics appear correctly on ballots. Boye said "if you've got a candidate who uses, like, an accent mark ... it needs to be on the ballot as they spell their name, and you can't do that without those characters." The committee’s majority, however, voted down that amendment 4–9.
After the failed character‑set amendment, the committee voted to pass the bill as amended; the final committee vote on SB 526 was 9–4 in favor. Committee discussion noted vendor concerns and that election vendors had requested flexibility; sponsor testimony indicated the amendment to soften the requirement was intended to accommodate vendor capabilities while preserving the policy objective.
The committee’s roll‑call votes rejecting and approving amendments are recorded in the committee minutes. The bill passed committee and will proceed to the next legislative stage.
