Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minnesota State officials warn of worsening budget outlook, federal headwinds for higher education
Summary
Vice Chancellor Bill Mackey told trustees that the governor’s budget included no part of Minnesota State’s $465 million request and projected state and federal changes — including a Moody’s downgrade of higher education — are prompting campuses to model multiple spending scenarios ahead of tuition and operating budget votes this spring.
Vice Chancellor Bill Mackey told the Minnesota State Board of Trustees on March 19 that the system’s FY26 operating request was not included in the governor’s budget and that state and federal trends are creating a tighter funding environment for campuses.
Mackey said the governor’s proposal represented “no change” from current funding law, adding: “No portion of Minnesota State’s $465,000,000 budget request was included in the governor’s budget recommendation.” He warned trustees the shortfall would reduce campus-based appropriations and tuition-replacement funding compared with current law.
The system’s update described two near-term impacts: a projected reduction in annual campus-based appropriations of about $22.5 million (roughly a 3.4% base cut) and a $12.5 million reduction in tuition-replacement funding (about 1.7% of a tuition rate). Mackey also pointed to a weaker state economic forecast announced March 6 that trimmed the projected biennial surplus and left Minnesota Management & Budget projecting spending growth outpacing revenue through FY29.
Mackey also flagged a fresh rating outlook from Moody’s for the higher-education sector: “Moody’s has revised the higher ed outlook to negative, for the sector from stable due to recent and potential federal policy changes that have created a more challenging operating environment for higher education,” he told trustees. He listed federal research cuts, proposals affecting diversity/equity programs, reductions to Department of Education staff and potential changes to Pell grants, student-loan policy and foreign-student visas as contributing factors.
Campus leaders are already running multiple scenarios, Mackey said. State appropriation remains unknown, tuition-setting and compensation changes are months away and revenue/expense assumptions can shift daily. The board was told the system will present first and second readings of the FY26 operating budgets in May and June with a board action expected at the June meeting, “assuming that the legislative work is done on time.”
Trustees asked about planning timelines and risk. Mackey said campuses are examining short-term cash-flow fixes and longer-term steps; he cited an example in which Moody’s-driven uncertainty has caused some institutions nationally to pause investments, freeze hiring and cut spending. He also noted a systemwide briefing and ongoing work with CFOs and the Leadership Council to refine assumptions before the April budget update.
The board received the presentation for discussion; no formal board action or vote on operating budgets occurred at the March 19 meeting.
