Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners say Yukon Water board pressed for review rights; town staff say occupancy depends on water connection
Summary
Fielding commissioners reported tensions after attending a Yukon Water board meeting where Yukon sought signoff on subdivisions and developers' water arrangements. Commissioners said Yukon does not have final authority over town decisions but that water shares, meters and occupancy permits are practical obstacles for builders.
Commission members reported at a Fielding Planning Commission meeting that a recent Yukon Water board session raised objections to the town approving subdivisions or building activity without Yukon review of water engineering and water-share availability.
A commission member summarized the Yukon meeting by saying the water board president urged Yukon to review and provide engineering feedback before the town approved projects. The commissioner told colleagues the meeting felt like Yukon was trying to assert control over town decisions; the commission pushed back, saying Yukon is a separate public entity and cannot dictate municipal approvals.
Commissioners and staff described a recent example in which a property owner obtained a building permit but did not have water service. Staff said the permit-processing sequence and paperwork gaps meant the owner could not take occupancy until he had an active water connection or a well. The commission advised that an occupant cannot receive an occupancy permit without water service and that the town could ask the county to place a stop or red card on a project lacking required utilities.
The commission described Yukon Water's water-share inventory and market in general terms. Speakers said Yukon had roughly 66 water shares earlier and that sales to subdivisions had reduced available shares; one speaker said the available shares were in the low 50s. A market price for a share was discussed during the meeting, with a figure of about $40,000–$42,000 mentioned.
At the Yukon meeting, speakers reported a dispute over whether Yukon could require developers to buy and hold water shares for a year before a subdivision proceeded. The commission said Yukon staff asked for one-year holds on shares in at least one instance and that the Yukon president described a one-year retention period for water shares without a connection. Commission members said that approach creates financial and procedural friction and that the town will invite Yukon to future commission meetings to discuss how the two entities can coordinate without one entity dictating approvals.
Commissioners encouraged residents to attend commission meetings and noted that Yukon representatives are welcome to bring water items to the planning commission agenda for discussion. No formal policy changes were made at this meeting.
